Citation:
https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes.../#sidestory_01
The passage: Thus when Venat announced her decision to relinquish her office, it was that much more unexpected. A jest, surely. Yet she spoke in glowing terms of her chosen successor, a "fascinating man" she had met on her travels.
"You would surrender the seat of Azem with so much left undone?" the archivist asked, still reeling at the implications.
"A true traveler has no need of a title," Venat said. "And my replacement would benefit greatly from the opportunities granted by the appointment."
“The journey is different for each who undertake it. Even following the same route, and visiting the same destinations, he will have different thoughts and experiences. He will make his own discoveries, and observe that which I failed to perceive."
My reply: It's a faulty assumption to just assume Azem was born in Amourot because the text doesn't explicitly say so. The vagueness of being met during travels without saying something along the lines of a "fellow Amourotian" or a "younger ancient" proves they have to be from somewhere not Amourot. How often to do you go out of town, make new friends, then just assume they will live where you do? If you meet a romantic partner on vacation isn't it silly to just assume they will live near you?
Furthermore, at this point in the narrative, there is no point in hiding the fact that the player's Azem is from Amourot. We are talking about plot points that are 2 expansions old. They are being vague because there is more to tell. The following lines about the player's Azem having their own thoughts, experiences and discoveries really lays out the road to who and what Azem are, more importantly, what was so important they didn't intervene in a civil war between their mentor and best friends.
Lastly, this isn't the first time you've attacked my posts by claiming my evidence is bad or my logic is bad. I don't know what I ever did that upset you in the first place. But dig up our old posts from a few years ago and you'll see that you've had a problem with anything I say over and over. I'm here to speculate in a speculation thread. I'd prefer a discussion without the combative tone.