Results 1 to 10 of 60

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Jojoya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    9,132
    Character
    Jojoya Joya
    World
    Marilith
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Solowing View Post
    .

    People want a instanced house that can be upgraded in size, can freely be visited like a ward house, have all the amenities of a FC house but isnt demolishable like a apt. Why would anyone want a plot?
    Ask all those who post here that say they prefer ward housing and wouldn't use instanced.

    Demolition isn't needed with instanced housing because an inactive player isn't taking up server space needed by an active player.

    With ward housing, the inactive player is always taking up server space that could go to an active player instead. That's why demolition exists - to give active players a chance at getting a plot when supply is low. The side effect is the need to maintain a sub since you can't log in and enter without one (unless there's a free log-in campaign conveniently timed).

    I doubt that instanced housing will be able to offer intercross gardening if it's dependent on a weather cycle as has been stated by SE in the past. There's one thing to retain interest in ward housing. SE doesn't have to add workshops to instanced housing. They can leave them as a ward housing feature, assuming they don't detach them completely. FCs could be required to stick to ward housing instead of getting access to the instanced housing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ayan_Calvesse View Post
    Personally if folks want instanced housing I would make it simple and accessed similar to a apartment; just a door you walk in the capital cities to enter your "home"; the problem is I am already seeing the scope creep happen as now folks want yards and such; after which they will want special ward instances so that their FC can create a neighborhood...which will sound eerily familiar to some...
    Place the "door" in the wards instead and it could encourage a more lively environment for those who want ward housing.

    Personally I don't see FC "neighborhoods", whether ward or instanced, working out over the long run if SE were to try implementing them. Most FCs have too much turnover. I doubt instances could be designed large enough to handle a house for every member of the larger FCs. And of course then there's the drama when members don't get along.
    (1)
    Last edited by Jojoya; 04-21-2024 at 07:23 AM.

  2. #2
    Player
    Solowing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    [<<Sand Island>>]
    Posts
    976
    Character
    Roll Ryuko
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Ninja Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Jojoya View Post
    Ask all those who post here that say they prefer ward housing and wouldn't use instanced.

    Demolition isn't needed with instanced housing because an inactive player isn't taking up server space needed by an active player.

    With ward housing, the inactive player is always taking up server space that could go to an active player instead. That's why demolition exists - to give active players a chance at getting a plot when supply is low. The side effect is the need to maintain a sub since you can't log in and enter without one (unless there's a free log-in campaign conveniently timed).

    I doubt that instanced housing will be able to offer intercross gardening if it's dependent on a weather cycle as has been stated by SE in the past. There's one thing to retain interest in ward housing. SE doesn't have to add workshops to instanced housing. They can leave them as a ward housing feature, assuming they don't detach them completely. FCs could be required to stick to ward housing instead of getting access to the instanced housing.


    Place the "door" in the wards instead and it could encourage a more lively environment for those who want ward housing.

    Personally I don't see FC "neighborhoods", whether ward or instanced, working out over the long run if SE were to try implementing them. Most FCs have too much turnover. I doubt instances could be designed large enough to handle a house for every member of the larger FCs. And of course then there's the drama when members don't get along.
    My subscription hasn't lapsed since 2016, that's a 9 year streak, due in part I maintain my subscription to keep my plots. Now you can offer me a house that isn't able to be demolished. Sure it doesn't demolish. But S.E isn't going to want that free money walking away. In the current system I would lose both of them if I decided to take some time off. So I don't and my subscription continues.

    With Ward Housing anyone who's plot is standing has been there within the last 45 days, if they havent then their plot went back up for bid. So everyone with a plot is considered active at the time.

    A instanced plot (Not housing) (should) have a plot to plant stuff. But it should be limited to friends list. So you can do everything that plot owners can do. Except it lacks a physical space in the open and it isn't as easy to access for the masses. That way ward housing still has its appeal.
    (0)
    sandislandexpansev2.carrd.co <<Create. No limits.>>

    he's going to grift,harass, downplay, disenfranchise, gaslight, stalk,and gate keep!

  3. #3
    Player
    Jojoya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    9,132
    Character
    Jojoya Joya
    World
    Marilith
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Solowing View Post
    My subscription hasn't lapsed since 2016, that's a 9 year streak, due in part I maintain my subscription to keep my plots. Now you can offer me a house that isn't able to be demolished. Sure it doesn't demolish. But S.E isn't going to want that free money walking away. In the current system I would lose both of them if I decided to take some time off. So I don't and my subscription continues.

    With Ward Housing anyone who's plot is standing has been there within the last 45 days, if they havent then their plot went back up for bid. So everyone with a plot is considered active at the time.

    A instanced plot (Not housing) (should) have a plot to plant stuff. But it should be limited to friends list. So you can do everything that plot owners can do. Except it lacks a physical space in the open and it isn't as easy to access for the masses. That way ward housing still has its appeal.
    SE lets free money walk away all the time. Strange that I've had to keep pointing out for the last couple of months that demolition is suspended on the JP data centers still. That's one heck of a lot of free money they're potentially losing.

    I think you mention there what the appeal of ward housing to many is - a physical presence in the "open" that instanced housing will lack. No need to restrict instanced housing to friends only when most players aren't going to go out of their way to search for the housing of random players yet it leaves the option open for those few players who would.

    Most of those who like to casually tour houses will still stick to the wards for the convenience. A nicely decorated outside is more likely to lead to a nicely decorated inside so players get an idea of what to skip and what to check out. It would be a lot more hit and miss with instanced housing, unless SE were to implement a public like system such as RIFT had instead of keeping likes more private in the message books (you have to check the book to see the likes).

    Quote Originally Posted by Khryseis_Astra View Post
    No reason it can’t be a fully functional plot, inside and out, with the same visitation restrictions panel they already made for the Island.
    I doubt an improved instanced housing system would include intercross gardening (crossbreeding for seeds). Instances do not have actual weather like the open world does.

    Don't forget that garden patches don't work on IS. If they didn't do it there, they are unlikely to do it with instanced housing.

    That is one thing that will help retain appeal for the ward houses. If you want to get Thavnairian Onion seeds, they'll have to come from a ward house garden. If someone wants to buy seeds off the marketboard just to grow for the item, that would still be possible just as we can do it in apartments. But we would not be able to get seeds.
    (0)
    Last edited by Jojoya; 04-22-2024 at 06:42 AM.

  4. #4
    Player
    Solowing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    [<<Sand Island>>]
    Posts
    976
    Character
    Roll Ryuko
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Ninja Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Jojoya View Post
    SE lets free money walk away all the time. Strange that I've had to keep pointing out for the last couple of months that demolition is suspended on the JP data centers still. That's one heck of a lot of free money they're potentially losing.

    I think you mention there what the appeal of ward housing to many is - a physical presence in the "open" that instanced housing will lack. No need to restrict instanced housing to friends only when most players aren't going to go out of their way to search for the housing of random players yet it leaves the option open for those few players who would.

    Most of those who like to casually tour houses will still stick to the wards for the convenience. A nicely decorated outside is more likely to lead to a nicely decorated inside so players get an idea of what to skip and what to check out. It would be a lot more hit and miss with instanced housing, unless SE were to implement a public like system such as RIFT had instead of keeping likes more private in the message books (you have to check the book to see the likes).


    I doubt an improved instanced housing system would include intercross gardening (crossbreeding for seeds). Instances do not have actual weather like the open world does.

    Don't forget that garden patches don't work on IS. If they didn't do it there, they are unlikely to do it with instanced housing.

    That is one thing that will help retain appeal for the ward houses. If you want to get Thavnairian Onion seeds, they'll have to come from a ward house garden. If someone wants to buy seeds off the marketboard just to grow for the item, that would still be possible just as we can do it in apartments. But we would not be able to get seeds.
    They only turn off the demo timer for extraordinary circumstances, it will reenabled eventually.

    What you're asking for is a instanced plot, with the same housing options as plot owner, same amenities, except not subjected to the same 14/45 day demo timer? The compromise is visibility. You get your plot , but your instance isnt as accessible for random players. That visibility should be left to ward plots as incentive to obtain a ward plot (which then puts you on the demo timer). If you just want an instanced space to decorate, open visibility should be the compromise.

    Its a similar compromise to Apts. Apts are half the size of a small plot, however they don't get demod. So if you plan on coming and going a lot for months on end, a apt is a good choice for the non-committal.

    A instanced house is good for people who don't want to go through the hassle of bidding for a plot, that their friends can still visit. However its friends list limited. (Venue owners are going to need to use the Apt as a venue or bid on a ward house)

    Apts are smaller but have the visibility and cannot be demod.

    Ward Plots are larger the apts have visibility and take up physical space but have a demo timer.

    Edit: You can have a instanced plot, ward plot, and apartment
    (0)
    Last edited by Solowing; 04-22-2024 at 08:33 PM.
    sandislandexpansev2.carrd.co <<Create. No limits.>>

    he's going to grift,harass, downplay, disenfranchise, gaslight, stalk,and gate keep!

Tags for this Thread