You're a Disgrace

[strawberrycake]

The game has no incentive to improve. They have realized they can put together the same formulatic slop and we will all still buy it

Damn I feel Like it's 2010 Peak Wrath of the Lich King Reading this one Chief.

Kinda like The Director Ignoring feed back and not learning from all the other MMOs prior doing this exact same mistake they did isn;t a thing.

[Turtledeluxe]

You say this like people in XIV are impressed by literally anything (mounts, Glam, weapons etc). It's too easy to assume add ons were used so no one isnimpressed by anything as far as I've seen.

[Kuroka]

I cant believe all the ppl to defend mods and cheating, especially on online stuff... there are rules, they are set, you agree or you leave.

[recommendations]

I cant believe all the ppl to defend mods and cheating, especially on online stuff... there are rules, they are set, you agree or you leave.

It's the mindset that has overtaken the game. Like I said in my other thread about botting, if you aren't using them you're just putting yourself at a disadvantage. Square essentially gives you their approval to use whatever 3rd party addon you want as long as you don't flaunt it. Telehacks are so useful to win fall guys. You won't be banned either. Why run 100s of times when you can run 100 times telehacking to the end?

[Thurmnmurmn]

They're a bit extreme and make no sense but are we really just going to ignore the fact that you clipped that out of context?

Because the full context isn't needed? They asked what one specific line meant.

Not everything needs to have a hidden meaning.
I swear most of your posts I see you have to finish it with accusing another poster of something.

[NekoMataMata]

Because the full context isn't needed? They asked what one specific line meant.

Not everything needs to have a hidden meaning.
I swear most of your posts I see you have to finish it with accusing another poster of something.

I didn't.

It's funny that you're doing literally the same thing I was pointing out by clipping the quote and starting an argument over what should be basically a non-issue. It's like you live here on the forums for the sake of being contrarian.

Also, they asked what one specific line meant while removing the context that gave it meaning.

[Thurmnmurmn]

I didn't. You're just biased against me.

It's funny that you're doing literally the same thing I was pointing out by clipping the quote and starting an argument over what should be basically a non-issue. It's like you live here on the forums for the sake of being contrarian.

Someone asking a question for clarification is what you were "pointing out". You're constantly assuming what people mean.

And yes I did do that. At least I don't deny what I do. I'm calling you out for your stupid pointless passive aggressive comments.

[NekoMataMata]

Someone asking a question for clarification is what you were "pointing out". You're constantly assuming what people mean.

And yes I did do that. At least I don't deny what I do. I'm calling you out for your stupid pointless passive aggressive comments.

What I pointed out was that the answer to that person's question was clipped out of the quote. Like there's a lot they could've responded to considering their idea of facial brands or whatever for being just bad and instead they went for anything besides that.

Anyways, would you like to make any more admissions? You've acknowledged that you look for pointless arguments on the forum. You've acknowledged that you intentionally look for my posts, and you've acknowledged that you're being a hypocrite by making accusations against me for things I haven't really done. Is there anything else to add to the list? Do you feel validated? Do you feel better about yourself?

[Thurmnmurmn]

Sorry on the double post. On mobile and dunno how to edit.

@nekomatamata
The fact you say I'm bias against you supports my point. As far as I'm aware of, I've never interacted with you. What bias do I have against you exactly?

[NekoMataMata]

Sorry on the double post. On mobile and dunno how to edit.

@nekomatamata
The fact you say I'm bias against you supports my point. As far as I'm aware of, I've never interacted with you. What bias do I have against you exactly?

You've quoted me multiple times. You've even admitted right here that you are frequently on the look out for my posts:

Because the full context isn't needed? They asked what one specific line meant.

Not everything needs to have a hidden meaning.
I swear most of your posts I see you have to finish it with accusing another poster of something.

This either means that you're making a generalization/assumption about all of my posts, or that you have followed my posting around and have made that judgement accusation.