Pretty much. Wish they showed off more but we cant make an accurate judgement of the class yet to determine whether Viper is appropriate or not.
If its indeed a dot melee class then the name is warranted.
Good thing Dragoon spits fire or else everyone would be mad about its name.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_The_Royal_Dragoons
They chose an existing job that sounds similar to dragon for their dragon knight. It would be no different to using templar as a knight + religious undertones job.
Beyond the name there's no link between FF XIV Dragoon and those Dragoons. It's just a coincidence they have a similar named.
Don't forget the original name is "Dragon Knight", not "Dragoon".
Final Fantasy Dragoons are named after the mythical Dragons, not a british cavalry.
If you want to argue otherwise, please show an interview where the development team mentionned this british cavalry being the origin of inspiration.
Look, there's a fighter aircraft named the "Viper", is anyone complaining it doesn't shoot toxic missiles?
Japanese: Dragon Knight (竜騎士, Ryuukishi). This is just decent localisation.Beyond the name there's no link between FF XIV Dragoon and those Dragoons. It's just a coincidence they have a similar named.
Don't forget the original name is "Dragon Knight", not "Dragoon".
Final Fantasy Dragoons are named after the mythical Dragons, not a british cavalry.
If you want to argue otherwise, please show an interview where the development team mentionned this british cavalry being the origin of inspiration.
Look, there's a fighter aircraft named the "Viper", is anyone complaining it doesn't shoot toxic missiles?
Right, but that wouldn't hold up at all to even half the scrutiny being leveled at Viper presently.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_The_Royal_Dragoons
They chose an existing job that sounds similar to dragon for their dragon knight. It would be no different to using templar as a knight + religious undertones job.
The Dragoons were a British carabiner cavalry force. Our dragoons are not mounted, do not use anything like rifles, aren't dressed in red coats, aren't meant primarily to herd, harass, and point-stop enemy forces or quell civil unrest, and their connection to dragons isn't from their firearms.
It's been the name since ff2 where they were mounted and not associated with spears - not that estinien doesn't take every opportunity to ride dragons. You're also throwing some incredibly superficial differences in using a lot more words than necessary as a very transparent attempt to make your argument seem stronger. In addition the 1st royal dragoons are not the only dragoons in history, nor did britain have a monopoly on them.Right, but that wouldn't hold up at all to even half the scrutiny being leveled at Viper presently.
The Dragoons were a British carabiner cavalry force. Our dragoons are not mounted, do not use anything like rifles, aren't dressed in red coats, aren't meant primarily to herd, harass, and point-stop enemy forces or quell civil unrest, and their connection to dragons isn't from their firearms.
Discarding everything but the most basic interpretation, dragoon is still a word associated with a combat role, whereas viper has no such connection.
Localizations as often called them Dragon Knights (because they were armored lancers who rode dragons), and they predominantly used spears.
Dragon Knights are a small but powerful group of spear-wielding, wyvern-riding warriors in Final Fantasy II.
- Final Fantasy wiki.They're literally your example.You're also throwing some incredibly superficial differences in using a lot more words than necessary as a very transparent attempt to make your argument seem stronger. In addition the 1st royal dragoons are not the only dragoons in history, nor did britain have a monopoly on them.
Ask someone unfamiliar with XIV what the combat role of a Machinist would be. Of a Dancer. Or, mention first that there are non-combat professions and see whether they think Machinist and Dancer even are combat classes.
Heck, ask anyone who's heard of a "Dragoon" but not from FF and see if the "combat role" they'd imagine for it aligns with the idea you seem to think is inherent to the name.
You tell me there's a new Viper class added to WoW or to GW2 and I'll have a pretty immediate idea for Arena/Mythic+/Fractals/WvW (i.e., the only places with actually distinctive combat roles beyond a mere trinity) of what affordances it will bring: an ambusher probably with more burst control available to its single-target than AoE, with decent spot-pressure, likely useful at times as a harrier through threat (PvP) and maybe on-decisive-attack and ramped afflictions (PvE, lesser) rather than through constant crowd control. Those all and immediately come to mind just off that name.
Last edited by Shurrikhan; 10-26-2023 at 05:01 AM.
Yeah because if you read the opening paragraph it gives a brief description which fairly clearly states they are not the only ones- 1st dragoons imply the existence of more - and the convenient date there shows they are 350 years late to invent the word. Any further investigation would only cement this.
Excalibur is both a sword and their hereditary weapon isn’t it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.