I know like I said I don't really see the point in benchmarking that stuff when you keep the same hardware. Its pointless but apparently the person that did that article wanted to see something. The hardware they where using a X86 can use like I don't know lets just say 98% of all its resources. I don't understand the point of upgrading to hopefully get the extra 2% for your ROI. I don't know the actual numbers for that one but when it comes to computers its a good rule of thumb that you will never get more than 70% of what your hardware is capable of doing. Least that's what all my colleagues and professors always go by.