Garuda's Difficulty

[Grimwald]

Doing Garuda with Japanese latency is a huge advantage, as is Ifrit Extreme. A one second delay is a pretty big deal in technical fights.

[Leo_Hart]

Doing Garuda with Japanese latency is a huge advantage, as is Ifrit Extreme. A one second delay is a pretty big deal in technical fights.

You cant do that somebody can do with same latency, so mean you are good(skilled????) player? Is your little bro behind the controller?

P.S. nobody said the latency make no different, but that's not main factor.

[Risae]

You cant do that somebody can do with same latency, so mean you are good(skilled????) player? Is your little bro behind the controller?

P.S. nobody said the latency make no different, but that's not main factor.

LATENCY IS. THE. MAIN. FACTOR. FOR CHRIST SAKE

How do you think i'm able to NOT GETTING HIT BY ANYTHING BECAUSE I'M ACTUALLY ABLE TO DODGE THE FIRE IN World of Warcraft?

THIS is NOT possible in FFXIV.

God damnit Square is this your first MMO you made?

[Leo_Hart]

LATENCY IS. THE. MAIN. FACTOR. FOR CHRIST SAKE

How do you think i'm able to NOT GETTING HIT BY ANYTHING BECAUSE I'M ACTUALLY ABLE TO DODGE THE FIRE IN World of Warcraft?

THIS is NOT possible in FFXIV.

God damnit Square is this your first MMO you made?

You see it? my small factor became you MAIN FACTOR. Please dun compare ffxiv to hellokittyonline, i felt insulted.

[Risae]

You see it? my small factor became you MAIN FACTOR. Please dun compare ffxiv to hellokittyonline, i felt insulted.

Do you even know what the hell you're playing?

[Churchill]

LATENCY IS. THE. MAIN. FACTOR. FOR CHRIST SAKE

How do you think i'm able to NOT GETTING HIT BY ANYTHING BECAUSE I'M ACTUALLY ABLE TO DODGE THE FIRE IN World of Warcraft?

THIS is NOT possible in FFXIV.

God damnit Square is this your first MMO you made?

Nah FFXI is terrible too, but it benefited the JP playerbase a ton so there really wasn't a reason to change it.

[Chardrizard]

Yet first kill went to NA, its amazing people bring up latency in garuda fight, shows how clueless you are about the fight.

[Grimwald]

Yet first kill went to NA, its amazing people bring up latency in garuda fight, shows how clueless you are about the fight.

Oh? And yet you seem to agree that in the Ifrit Extreme fight it makes a difference, judging by the fact that you ignored that.

[Chardrizard]

Oh? And yet you seem to agree that in the Ifrit Extreme fight it makes a difference, judging by the fact that you ignored that.

I didnt comment on ifrit extreme bc i didnt experience it yet and act like i know it all, neither did i say there is no latency issue in garuda fight, just merely saying latency has not much impact in that fight die to how it works.

[Efrye]

Yet first kill went to NA, its amazing people bring up latency in garuda fight, shows how clueless you are about the fight.

How is latency not an issue during that fight?
I've only tried Garuda a couple of times, but our main problem was always avoiding her attacks during phase 2. Even when we were standing in the middle of the area and moved to the opposite side or behind her almost right the moment she reappeared, it still wasn't always enough.

I'm sure it can be done somehow - I'm certainly not arguing with that. But having less latency and thus more time to get out of the way should make it a good deal easier.

As for getting hit by her moves even though you are behind pillars, I've never ever seen that happen.

That constantly happened to me at first too, but only when I was too slow to get behind the pillar. It's pretty much the same as with Ifrit really: You can get hit by eruptions or plumes even if you're already 10 yalms away, but it shouldn't happen if you move out of the way fast enough.

(edit: Oh, didn't even notice it's you! /wave Evy )