I'm bored when I heal because I need more complex DPS rotations

[Renathras]

So how do you make the people who are bored need to heal more, without affecting the healing demanded of the people who are content with current healing requirements?

This question is a double edged sword - how do you make a damage increase for the people who are bored without affecting the people who are content with the current model?

[HyperiusUltima]

This question is a double edged sword - how do you make a damage increase for the people who are bored without affecting the people who are content with the current model?

Simple: SE dumps the baby with the bath water and decides they’re doing it their way - even though there is much criticism about how they do things.

[ForsakenRoe]

This question is a double edged sword - how do you make a damage increase for the people who are bored without affecting the people who are content with the current model?

By, as we've been through hundreds of times, making the potency difference between 'optimal' and 'suboptimal' low such that 'doing it wrong' is not enough to cause an enrage, but 'doing it right' has a gain in potency over 'wrong'. Avoiding the failure state of 'not dealing enough damage', that being 'you hit enrage'. Whereas with healing, you can increase the amount required to sate the higher end, but the lower end is not allowed to 'ignore' the extra requirement, it's unlikely the balance would allow them to play 'suboptimally' without it causing a wipe. And if it IS possible to play suboptimally re: more healing required, then it's not changed anything for the higher end, as they're already playing optimally as it is. Going from zero healing GCDs used to 'still zero GCDs used, but more OGCDs were needed' in a dungeon run is not gonna go down as 'successful rework' for the best players

[AmiableApkallu]

This question is a double edged sword - how do you make a damage increase for the people who are bored without affecting the people who are content with the current model?

The other edge of ForsakenRoe's question is better phrased as: How do you make the people who are bored able to damage more, without affecting the damage demanded of the people who are content with current damage requirements?

• Need to heal more > Able to damage more
• Healing demanded > Damage demanded
• Current healing requirements > Current damage requirements

I admit that there's a loss of parallelism in changing "need" to "able" in that first bullet point, but I think it better preserves the whole "healers should be required to heal more" versus "healers should have more interesting DPS options".

And the answer to that is straightforward: Don't tune DPS checks any differently than they're tuned currently. Pick from any number of healer DPS kit proposals that are specifically designed with the first bullet point above in mind.

[ForsakenRoe]

I admit that there's a loss of parallelism in changing "need" to "able" in that first bullet point, but I think it better preserves the whole "healers should be required to heal more" versus "healers should have more interesting DPS options".

And the answer to that is straightforward: Don't tune DPS checks any differently than they're tuned currently. Pick from any number of healer DPS kit proposals that are specifically designed with the first bullet point above in mind.

Man can you just do my job for me, you worded what I was thinking but couldn't find the words to say

Yes, 'more healing required' suffers the same binary flaw as we currently experience with our healing output, either we do need it, or we don't and it's a waste. Being 'able' to heal more doesn't mean anything. We can pump Cure3 if we want, it doesn't do anything for us in terms of gameplay engagement fun etc, unless we have the damage coming in to require that HPS. And if we DO have that damage coming in, then it's no longer a case of 'we are able to pump Cure3', it's 'we NEED to pump Cure3'. In contrast, more damage tools, should they be tuned correctly (big ask for SE I know), would be mostly ignoreable. Let's say WHM got Banish tomorrow in a patch, and it's 350p. That's more than Glare. As long as the player uses EITHER button, they meet the DPS output for that GCD that was expected of them today, which is the 310p of 'Glare'. Banish's additional output would be, in the current tier, completely optional. Doubly so because we have gear now

[Shurrikhan]

So how do you make the people who are bored need to heal more, without affecting the healing demanded of the people who are content with current healing requirements?

You'd pretty much have to have a reward for more quick/timely (not more) healing that results in an rDPS increase, rather than impacting survival.

That'd be something like players having lower output when on the verge of death (e.g., 1% less output per %HP missing below 50% HP), and/or the ability to cleanse Damage Dealt Down stacks, though that "healing" then would be solely Esuna.

In that gamestate, you'd maybe want to save ST oGCDs just to more quickly pop people's HP back up after unpredictable damage that isn't best solved via just another AoE, while using precast GCD heals on the more predictable stuff. That in turn would probably have us want a bit more granular control over the timing of our heals, etc., none of which would necessarily be bad.

However, it would ultimately be actions done and considerations made to increase rDPS... not survival. Which is not a "need" so much as a "want", as there is very little chance of that being significant enough to really impact one's chance of hitting Enrage (especially compared to just not letting people die, not wasting GCDs, and keeping one's casts rolling, as per now).

This question is a double edged sword - how do you make a damage increase for the people who are bored without affecting the people who are content with the current model?

Literally any increase to damage that isn't so negligible as to not be worth bothering with (in favor of focusing solely on more rewarding factors of gameplay) but continues to be miles away from making a difference to the likelihood of an enrage in a normal party (the full number of players, none with broken gear, minds, or internet).

A commonly mentioned dependence on using or not using an additional tool, for instance, has been less than 10% of maximum DPS, which in turn tends to be at most 1.5% of party DPS -- i.e., negligible to one's chances to hit enrage compared to any given mistake that'd be easily visible to others or even just standard deviation in/from Crit/DHit luck across the party.

___________

Unless you specifically nerf of the damage contributed by the existing tools, allowing Healers more damage through their agency does not at all affect the engagement required of others. It's excess to requirement, and therefore will not affect those who do not wish to use it.

If Healers are not indirectly buffed through those new actions, and their PPM is instead siphoned off from their filler action, etc., to support the bonuses-over-filler of the new skills, then that loss possible would still negligible (e.g., under 1.5% of party DPS). However, there seems little need to avoid buffing healer damage, given that healers are already the role most likely to be skipped over in favor of others, so that is pretty well moot.

Requiring more healing, however, will affect all players, whether they want it or not -- because it's healing, and the only way to require healing is to make the party die when the healing is insufficient.