Quote Originally Posted by Renathras View Post
You guys did this to me, so I just hold you to the same standard. Overstating your case without any citation to support it is something worth calling out. If I said "A lot of people want healers to stay as they are", you guys don't accept that. I know, because I've said it before, and "A lot" was something you guys don't agree with and felt you had to minimize. So I altered my language to accommodate your demands. I merely hold your arguments to the same standard. Fair's fair, right?
Except, I never made a majority argument....? I just stated what people were talking about back then, I didn't add any qualifier to it, not most, not many, not all.

Quote Originally Posted by Renathras View Post
And the thing is, the Devs DO have that data. They know whether healer numbers are up or down, which healers people are playing more and less, and what people are saying in various forms of feedback. Meaning it's very likely they are aware of those views, they DID look into them, and they decided they do not represent the whole.
Except, dev data without feedback is useless. So why are you being dismissive of the feedback that others give?

Quote Originally Posted by Renathras View Post
The alternative is you get nothing, and are upset. Or perhaps worse, you eventually get the Devs to capitulate, and then maybe we find out a majority DIDN'T agree with you, and now all those people are upset, and we have the same problem from the other end until eventually the Devs capitulate to them.
So, let me ask you a serious question. Why is it of such importance that we not upset the current healer playerbase when nobody gave a single care to those who were upset going into ShB from SB?