Latest Official Developer Statements About Healer DPS?

[Absurdity]

SE tried to solve this in Abyssos. Their method of solving lack of healing required is to make raidwides that deal more than the max HP of the party so you just die unless you mitigate it, which(to no one's surprise) made double shield healer a much better option than 1 shield + 1 regen.

I don't think the fight designers truly understand how to make a proper healing-intensive fight, which is weird, because Barbariccia is a good fight design that fits the bill of "more healing requirement" rather than Rubicante/Golbez and their mechanics which can just kill you from full without mitigation.

But that brings us to the usual problem, even if they made proper healing-intensive fights they will still be 100% limited to just savage, ultimate and maybe the odd extreme. So in the majority of content, expert roulette, alliance raid, normal raid, treasure maps, etc you will still be bored to death.

Not to mention that if you take a good hard look at healer's healing kits they're not very interesting either, outside of very few exceptions like Haima, Liturgy and Macrocosmos. So you've replaced spamming Glare with spamming Medica, the most bland "make HP bar go up" spell ever, GG.

[ForsakenRoe]

But that brings us to the usual problem, even if they made proper healing-intensive fights they will still be 100% limited to just savage, ultimate and maybe the odd extreme. So in the majority of content, expert roulette, alliance raid, normal raid, treasure maps, etc you will still be bored to death.

Yes, this is the point that gets lost in the sauce it seems. It's not a case of 'healer is boring in Savage because 111111', it's that if you've done {whatever level of content} and gotten accustomed to that level of gameplay, then anything below that is more bland because 111111. Changing Savage to hit harder so we have to heal more, for example, does not address the tedium of 24mans or EX roulette, they'll still be as monotonous as before, because we cannot bump them too much or casual players will suffer (supposedly). So instead, a simple, yet focused 2 or 3 changes to each healer's damage rotation, balanced in such a way that ignoring the new additions is a smaller potency loss than something like 'ignoring your DOT' is right now, is what to look into, I think. If someone is skilled enough to use the new rotation, they can. If they are not, they can ignore parts of it until they get more comfortable with the job and start to throw in more and more of the rotation. Nobody is going to cause a wipe in Lapis Manalis because they could not work out how to effectively use their new Miasma DOT on SCH. They might, however, cause a wipe if they cannot keep up with the fact Cagnazzo has learned how to make his water AOEs do 30% more damage, or that they had to press more healing spells, ran out of MP for the first time in their time playing FFXIV and could not cast any more spells.

None of us went from zero damage spells to instantly full blast. We started by throwing in our DOT here and there, then maybe a Stone or two, and working our way up. In fact, I would put real money on the following statement being true:

'Back in SB, when SCH had Miasma at 24s and Bio2 at 30s, a fairly large chunk of the playerbase settled for just refreshing both at the same time when Miasma needed refreshing, clipping Bio by 6s each time for a small DPS loss.'

It wasn't 'required' for SCHs to make sure to NEVER clip Bio's duration in the way described above. Those two lost ticks per 24s would not have been the make-or-break thing that causes a clear vs enrage, especially when AST existed in the form that it did. But some love to imply that any amount of extra complexity will have casuals causing wipes left and right due to missed DOT ticks and losing casts due to analysis paralysis on 'what damage button do I press next'

[Tint]

Yes, this is the point that gets lost in the sauce it seems. It's not a case of 'healer is boring in Savage because 111111', it's that if you've done {whatever level of content} and gotten accustomed to that level of gameplay, then anything below that is more bland because 111111. Changing Savage to hit harder so we have to heal more, for example, does not address the tedium of 24mans or EX roulette, they'll still be as monotonous as before, because we cannot bump them too much or casual players will suffer (supposedly).

With the amount of healing and mitigation tools non-healers have available they pretty much can increase the healing requirements in easier content. When the casual healer can't keep up then the rest of the party can step up their game.

[ForsakenRoe]

With the amount of healing and mitigation tools non-healers have available they pretty much can increase the healing requirements in easier content. When the casual healer can't keep up then the rest of the party can step up their game.

Not all damage is avoidable, though. Should SE tune healing required from the healer around the party standing in every AOE, zero AOEs, or some point in between? And if it's some midpoint, where, 50% of AOEs stood in? 75%, 25%? When you consider how much damage EG the thunder tiger guy in Aetherfont can put out if you stand in every AOE, it's ridiculously high. But you're not meant to, you're meant to dodge those AOEs. And if you dodge every AOE, suddenly the damage he does to you is woefully low. So, do we need less dodgeable damage and more raidwide damage? Maybe that's got the beginnings of an idea, but again, it'll potentially cause some casuals to be unable to keep up and cause wipes. If 'more damage buttons' is not the solution for that reason, then more healing required sure isn't, imo

Imagine that every time that thunder guy does a jump to place lightning tendrils to dodge, he also does proximity damage from where he lands. Suddenly, even with dodging those four back to back jumps, and dodging the lightning they spawn, you still have to worry about taking say 30%-50% of your HP bar per jump (based on gear and distance), and the threat of someone getting combo'd by that damage, into a lightning they didn't quite dodge, means you have to be more on the ball with healing. But again, what if the healer is unable to keep up? What if they cannot heal because they're too focused on trying to dodge the mechanic, so someone dies? Or worse, what if it's the healer that dies to this extra damage? It's been used as a reason in the past, to keep things more approachable for casuals: 'if the healer is the only source of Res and goes down, the party is all but doomed to a wipe, so SE tries to keep the stress of the healer role lower to avoid that outcome'. Adding more healing required in this regard would run counter to that design approach

[PercibelTheren]

Not to mention that if you take a good hard look at healer's healing kits they're not very interesting either, outside of very few exceptions like Haima, Liturgy and Macrocosmos. So you've replaced spamming Glare with spamming Medica, the most bland "make HP bar go up" spell ever, GG.

I honestly think this is the core issue of why healers feel so boring. The healing abilities themselves are effective tools, but they're not FUN. I would like them to diversify what they do. I like delayed healing abilities like Macrocosmos. Lean into some healing tools giving a heal over time but little spot healing. Make some abilities spot healing without the regen. Make me use the correct tool for the job. Right now every raidwide is solved by "just use whichever OGCD is not on cooldown."

[Renathras]

And even in the very rare case they do let healers wear metal (laws order is the only class specific example I can think of) they have to add a frilly dress extension to it just so you don’t forget you are a healer and healers wear robes

Don't forget the Ronkan (I think?) gear from ShB. It's chianmail, which is very much metal.

Got any data to back any of that up?

Fast forward to Stormblood and you started to see a real shift. Cleric Stance in it's original form was gone, WHM finally had MP to spare and all 3 healers had access to solid oGCD heals at this point. This is where the DPSing healer became the norm at all levels of endgame content rather than the exception.

Do you?
Or is this just your heresay again?

You made a claim first. Can you prove it?

ShB was when just about every Healer felt comfortable DPSing...because the DPSing was so streamlined that it was almost down to "if no healing is needed, press this button over and over until healing is needed". This is when midcore content and even casual content adopted the policy, as well as Extremes and even Experts, and it was the expectation across all levels of endgame content, not just Savages. Note that "Endgame" does not mean "Savages", it also includes Expert roulette and Extremes.

The real problem is healing demands in most duties. In most duties you arent being forced to heal at all. Power creep makes this worse at an excessively quick speed making duties just 2 patches older trivial. Its just very bad balance towards healers.

If healers were more reliably demanded to heal, the 1 dps button wouldnt have been an issue to begin with. The real problem is lack of healing demands which causes healers to focus to dps.

Hammer -> Nail's Head

This is the reality of our situation.

Too much power creep, too many overpowered oGCDs reducing the need to GCD heal, encounters designed to be mitigation checks rather than healing on unavoidable damage AND for avoidable damage to outright kill most players so that healing to make up for mistakes often isn't possible, and in more casual content (and some hardcore content, like the Ultimate TOP that was 0 healer cleared) Tanks and DPSers having too much healing as well. (Look at how much healing DNC can output sometime; it's insane and makes 4 man fights trivial to clear without a Healer, and obviously I don't need to explain WAR at this point, right?)

But that brings us to the usual problem, even if they made proper healing-intensive fights they will still be 100% limited to just savage, ultimate and maybe the odd extreme. So in the majority of content, expert roulette, alliance raid, normal raid, treasure maps, etc you will still be bored to death.

Not to put too fine a point on it: But this will always be true from highly skilled players doing casual content.

"But not DPSers!"

...yes, DPSers, too. A lot of high end players get bored doing AOEspam wall-to-wall pulls and see Experts as a chore to DPS, too. And for people used to doing DPS rotations while avoiding complex mechanics in the Savage dance, doing an optimal DPS rotation during one-mechanic-every-60-second octopus at the end of Aetherfont is "bored to death", too. Same for Tanks. There's nothing unique to Healers about that.

If high end content engages you, that's what you're going to be doing more of, and with the advent of Criterion, they don't need to change-up "casual" content to be "not boring" for high end players if you have valid alternatives to grind for tomes/etc.

To put it simply, you likely CANNOT design content that is non-trivial/non-boring for high end players to do over and over and over again that ALSO is still accessible for normal players in a general environment. And this community has generally accepted that MSQ is for everyone, not just hardcore people, who tend to only do it once before moving on to content more engaging to them. (Note Expert roulette is MSQ content, thus is MSQ). At the end of the day, some content is just going to be boring for you if you're a hardcore raider. That really can't be helped. The goal should be to make it where such players don't need to keep doing the content (most everyone's fine with the one run for the story, but not the weekly grind for tomes) and can get their tomes from content they find more enjoyable.

Honestly, Criterion is an interesting design choice going forward since it has both solo, casual, and hardcore versions. It just needs to provide tomes commensurate to that.

Yes, this is the point that gets lost in the sauce it seems.

I don't think it does, it's a different argument.

Think about it - how in-depth would a healer rotation in Lapis Manalis have to be for you not to be bored? Would a 1-2-3 not still be boring? (As noted in that ongoing discussion in the Healer forum right now, everyone seems to agree that wouldn't do it). What about a SMN rotation? No, that gets called boring all the time as well. So it would have to be a full on DPSer rotation before "more DPS buttons" would really fix the problem. Dia having a Thundercloud proc would be novel for...a week. A 1-2-3 Stone-Aero-Water combo would be boring overnight.

I think the issue is that nothing WOULD actually make 4 man casual content NOT boring for high end players such as yourself or others like you, unless we get something either high APM like GNB or DPSer level difficult like BLM. And at that point, we run into all the attendant issues of Healers having full on DPS rotations.

Moreover, an additional issue:

UNLESS the damage gap between optimal and "glarespammer" is small, then when you get a Healer that does the bare minimum, now you're extending the time the run takes to the point of really annoying regular people, and we run into people just dropping healers and doing 1T/3D premades (even more than they do now). Meaning people's "get in, get out" runs will take even longer, leading to even...more...complaints.

Also:

With the amount of healing and mitigation tools non-healers have available they pretty much can increase the healing requirements in easier content. When the casual healer can't keep up then the rest of the party can step up their game.

No I agree they don't want healers to be more offensive. They just haven't faced the reality that unless you give healers something else to do (buffing, debuffing, cc cleansing, more healing) they're going to be more offensive because that's all a healer's kit is.

More or less, this.

I honestly think this is the core issue of why healers feel so boring. The healing abilities themselves are effective tools, but they're not FUN. I would like them to diversify what they do. I like delayed healing abilities like Macrocosmos. Lean into some healing tools giving a heal over time but little spot healing. Make some abilities spot healing without the regen. Make me use the correct tool for the job. Right now every raidwide is solved by "just use whichever OGCD is not on cooldown."

This, and that we're so oGCD healing focused, it leaves us with a LOT of "dead" GCDs to fill, so we fill them with the same damage nuke spam. If all oGCD heals were GCD heals (or, at least, a lot more of them were), that would change that a lot. WHM right now has the least oGCD healing and the least Glarespam (ironic, given the name) of all the Healers.

[AmiableApkallu]

If all oGCD heals were GCD heals (or, at least, a lot more of them were), that would change that a lot. WHM right now has the least oGCD healing and the least Glarespam (ironic, given the name) of all the Healers.

When I ran the first third of Lv.70 Swallow's Compass as WHM with a DRG and BRD -- no tank, 'cause they DC'ed! -- what did I do? Nuke spam. And that was even while **I** was the one tanking the trash.

Putting healing on the GCD will not change the feel of an encounter all that much so long as the incoming damage model remains as it is. /two cents

[Renathras]

...

Funny thing, I've always been respectful in interactions with you, and generally respected your expertise while agreeing with you on many points - not all, mind you, but many. Yet now, you've decided as of yesterday, for me committing the crime of agreeing with something specific someone else said that is literally something I've been saying for months/years now, that I'm your personal enemy. Now you're being hyper snarky for no good reason (being a dick, basically) because you decided to blow a gasket for me daring to agree with someone agreeing with me - for once - in the healer forum.

I don't get it, but whatever. Perhaps you thought while I was alone and isolated, I wasn't a threat, and now that others are agreeing with me, I am, and so must be destroyed, but I honestly don't know. It has been a STARK and noticeable change on your part, though.

So as for your comments:

1) I won't rehash the slidecasting to - yet again - point out you and the rest of the mob got that wrong (surprise surprise) and just didn't read what I wrote AND ignored the clarification I made because you'd rather just be a dick about it like the rest. So it's pointless to try and convince any of you to change your mind since you think it nettles me to bring it up and won't surrender that dickishness. So moving on...

2) I did, in fact, have AND USE Cleric. I used Cleric when soloing and doing the MSQ outright, and I also used it when it was safe to do so in dungeons and stuff that I did at the time. I'm both aware of Cleric AND aware of what it does AND I was a proficient user of it before SB. Where did I say it DIDN'T change in SB? I said ShB is when healer DPS became (effectively) one button, and THAT was when healers DPSing became the norm in all level cap content. Again, I'll point out that you said "endgame" not "Savage". So this doesn't "prove" your point that healers doing damage became the expected norm in SB. And you "proving" Cleric changed isn't relevant, since I didn't challenge that point. Where did I say "Cleric didn't change in SB, it changed in ShB!!!"? Oh, right - I didn't. (Though I suppose we can note it was removed, but...neither of us were arguing that point). So this proves nothing, since that point wasn't under contest.

3) "links" - What are you arguing here? Where did I say that Cleric wasn't changed in SB? I'm asking you to prove that ShB wasn't where healer DPS became common and expected in endgame, it was SB. You didn't prove that. You just proved that Cleric was changed in SB, a point I agree with since...why wouldn't I? It's history and a fact. It IS funny, though, how thoroughly those links prove that Cleric Stance was a bad ability and people were literally cheering when it was removed as a toggle, something current people here insist is untrue and all insist that Cleric was the height of healer game design... So thanks for proving me right, I guess?

4) Aww, is poor baby mad that I called her bluff?

5) The very thing I asked you to prove was that SB was when dpsing healers became the majority. You instead proved that Cleric Stance was changed away from a toggle. That's not the same thing. That's you doing the "Instructions Unclear" meme.

6) Psst, where did I say failing to maintain 100% DoT and AF uptime locked you out of your DPS kit?

.

You're still up: You didn't prove the thing I asked you to PROVE - that healing being the majority in all endgame content (remember, this includes roulettes) was the norm in SB.

You "proved" a point not contested - that Cleric was changed then - and you proved a point I've long said despite your typical posse here harping on me for it - that Cleric was a bad ability not good game design (my typical wording is "the single most rose tinted goggles ability in all of MMO history" or similar).

.

You did not prove the point actually contested - that dpsing on healers in ALL endgame content became the mainstream/norm/majority in SB and not ShB.

So...try again?

Or, perhaps, realize the truth: You can't prove it. Without data that we both know you don't have, it's not a claim you CAN prove.

.

If you narrow your scope, you could be right, btw. If we're talking only Savage content, then it probably is true that Healer DPS was the norm in SB (if not a bit before, since some Alex fights mathematically required it, Dev intention or no). But that isn't what you said and isn't what I asked for proof of. What I'm asking you to prove is that the majority in all endgame content were dpsing and that it was the expectation and norm by that point. Something that - hint hint - isn't provable.

.

EDIT:

To address your edited addition:

You have 5 anecdotes (including one REALLY dickish tank). So are you suggesting that SB's playerbase was only 9 (or less) people? Because 5 is only a majority in a group of 9 or less...

But if you really want to use THAT - god no, but whatever - then look at ShB and I'll bet you find a lot more.

Again, what you claimed isn't something you can actually prove. You can try to support it, but you're not going to be able to do much more than anecdote because you don't have any statistical data to prove it.

[Sebazy]

Or, perhaps, realize the truth: You can't prove it. Without data that we both know you don't have, it's not a claim you CAN prove.Or, perhaps, realize the truth: You can't prove it. Without data that we both know you don't have, it's not a claim you CAN prove.

I can provide substance such as the narrative rapidly spreading through the player base at the time to back up my claims, all you seem to be able to bring is comic relief, false claims and trolls.

Here's another alternative source:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards...eborn/75492492

A simple 'how are you finding healers after Stormblood's release'. Look at how many replies are mentioning their DPS.

Still waiting for you to provide some substance to back up your claims btw.

[Renathras]

I can provide substance such as the narrative rapidly spreading through the player base at the time to back up my claims,

Except you can't and didn't. You provided anecdotes from a curated segment of the population, which isn't proof of majority - you're moving the goalposts and hoping I don't call you on it.

"replies mentioning their DPS" isn't a proof of "the majority of healers in all types of endgame content are now DPSing and it is the common expectation". You're not proving what you think you're proving. So you have yet to provide substancee to back up your claims.

Still waiting for you to provide some substance to back up your claims btw.
(I've already given you two outs, why are you still digging your hole deeper?)

all you seem to be able to bring is comic relief, false claims and trolls.

Sebazy? What happened to you?