Quote Originally Posted by Tanis_Ebonhart View Post
The Healer dps issue seems to only be an issue for vets. First of all, what is a "vet" to you?
Most players seem content with healers not having a lot of DPS things they have to juggle alongside healing and mechanics. A "lot" doesn't mean that all options should be off the table for discussion. Nor does it mean that because some people don't want to use some skills that it should block those options for everyone who wants to have them available.

Besides, if they want that style then there's always Sage. What "style"- Sage doesn't really provide very different options from the other healers. Most of your time is going to be spent using dosis. Aside from that it's very similar to SCH.

No reason to rock the boat just to appease some vets at the cost of the majority. Again- where do you get this from? What cost? what majority?
Which we know that is the case considering that the easiest healers are the ones that are played the most. We don't "know" this - this is your hypotheis. How do you know that it's because it is because they are easier- it could be because they are the first healers available (WHM, SCH), the most appealing (lore), or perhaps because the healer has gone through so many reworks it's not really liked in its current state (AST)?
See my response this is your opinion, there have been multiple posts in the healer forums with actual metrics that run counter to this- do you have anything to back this up?