Quote Originally Posted by PredatoryCatgirl View Post
I'm just saying that because its possible, a rule had to be put in place.
Its because there is plenty of proof of people deliberately faking these things to put blame on players.

And note that depending on the country, its illegal to do (its a crime that can put you in prison). Slander is not a joke. And the damage is easily done. It doesnt matter whether you can proof it was false afterward, since a lot of people might already have decided to boycot and never even see that result (or dont even trust it).

With such rule, even if a name now is displayed, players are more likely to see the potentialy malicious intent of the screenshot and wont judge as quickly. Its a good way to protect players. But it comes with the requirement that it must be enforced with penalties for not obeying these rules. You wont hurt the abuser at all if his name is displayed, he simply wont care. Yet an innocent person might get destroyed.

And companies can take even more extreme steps to handle these cases. You dont often hear about this as they keep things anonymous (being professional). But thats because most abuse doesnt happen on a very large scale. Sure 50 bots sounds a lot, but if its a single person using a single computer, its a minor thing. There is no large scale abuse then even though it might look like it. There is a reason you usualy only hear about the sellers of the software and not its users.