Quote Originally Posted by Iscah View Post
Why should the term "alt army" not be used to describe a large collection of alt accounts acting as a group and controlled by a single person?

It seems an accurate description to me. It reflects the number of accounts the person is using.

And yes, it is an army, not a series. They appear to have several active at any one time and sometimes stage arguments against themself or post multiple comments in a thread one after the other.
I've yet to see any more than two accounts at a time.

An army would be capable of hijacking threads wholesale and inflating like-counts regardless of public sentiment. His don't. His threads usually see as much activity as they do because they are directly lie near to an already contentious issue, and there are plenty of real posters responding with agreement to his less ironic / pure-bait posts, for the simple fact that they don't happen to be (taken from) rare or spurious positions.