
Originally Posted by
Cleretic
Yeah, this is an unfortunate consequence of how FFXIV's been writing its story: it clearly has a lot of sympathy for its oppressed and victims, but the fact that it's had two major villain groups that mainly aim towards total domination and destruction of their opposition--and have succeeded in doing that several times--means that those oppressed voices often get left out of that narrative. If I'm being kind, I feel like people who want to explore Ilsabard to see the remnants of the Empire aren't doing that because they care about the Empire, but because 'the Empire' is the only noun we've got for the area, and if we learned that there was a population in Ilsabard composed entirely out of clones of U.S. President James Buchanan they would instead be clamoring for us to visit the Buchanans, because we all immediately know they're the ones with the more compelling and sympathetic story.
As an aside, I suspect this is also a secret sauce for why Emet-Selch worked so well: his story let them take one of those villain groups based on total domination and destruction and write them with that sympathy for the victim, without taking away that villainous role, so they get to have their cake and eat it too. And they never have to think about the Ascians' victims in this whole equation, because they killed all the people in Skalla, so they don't have a voice in the discussion anyway.
But the truth is, FFXIV doesn't need that problem to exist anymore. The villain groups that created the problem of 'we want to be sympathetic towards victims, but the villains kept completely destroying their victims' are gone now. There's no need to reinvent or reintroduce this problem, we can just have villains who don't commit total genocide before we have the chance to meet their targets!