Fast-forwarding past the 'oh it was a retcon' situation and just getting right to the facts as put forward by Shadowbringers and Endwalker when these things were established as more than just vagaries here.
Cillia and thegreatoatmeal are correct on this: we can't read Zodiark as having any morality in and of itself, good or evil, because after a point very early in its life when Elidibus left it, it doesn't have the capacity or agency to do anything of its own; the question is akin to asking 'was the bomb guilty of destroying the building'. Zodiark is a thing, albeit a thing with gnarly teeth. And like all other things, we assign it morality instead as an extension of those who use it, either as a tool or as a symbol. And in Zodiark's case it happens to be both, as it's being used by a group who wants to destroy planets full of living, sentient and sapient people, both as justification ('we have to rejoin all these planets so Zodiark will be whole and can bring back our world') and as mechanism (Zodiark is powered by living sacrifices, which he was both doing before the sundering and what we can deduce they were going to do after the rejoinings). With at some point sympathetic reasons, and for originally benevolent purposes, but there comes a point when the bloodbath obscures all else; they went far beyond the line of what's reasonable.
Basically: Zodiark is not evil, not because it's morally good, but because it's morally nothing. And at the time of its creation, it may have even been a tool for good. But by the time of the game itself, the people using Zodiark had gone far beyond the pale and into unambiguous evil, and so their tool and symbol gets described as evil by extension.
EDIT: Also, since tempering came up while I was writing this, worth clarifying: while tempering was jacked up to the point of being a clear and present threat, Zodiark was indeed so enormously huge that he was causing tempering anyway; we have this confirmation from Livingway, from Emet-Selch, and from one of the Etched in the Stars crystals; at least one of those is probably compelling enough evidence to anyone. Hydaelyn may have been big enough to do this too, but we never got confirmation that she ever did.


Reply With Quote




