More GLAMOUR PLATES, please!

[tsuchii]

FFXIV has many shortcomings but this is the biggest one I really can't let go or defend.

7.0 is around the corner, 2 more jobs coming. There will be 22 jobs and 11 professions - and yet we still have only 20 plates.

How difficult could it be to match that? Or make it 50 slots!

Glamour is endgame. Myself and others raid for fancy weapons and dyable gear. Myself and others grind duties and PVP to get specific set pieces. Myself and others grind gil to buy and use glamour.

There's 800 limit in the glamour dresser now and we can barely plate any of them.

[AwesomeJr44]

something something 1.0 code

please understand

[CuriousPerson]

something something 1.0 code

please understand

like cable spaghetti

[Heroman3003]

FFXIV has many shortcomings but this is the biggest one I really can't let go or defend.

7.0 is around the corner, 2 more jobs coming. There will be 22 jobs and 11 professions - and yet we still have only 20 plates.

How difficult could it be to match that? Or make it 50 slots!

Glamour is endgame. Myself and others raid for fancy weapons and dyable gear. Myself and others grind duties and PVP to get specific set pieces. Myself and others grind gil to buy and use glamour.

There's 800 limit in the glamour dresser now and we can barely plate any of them.

I'd like to think that it might be next on the radar after the recent super-expansion of gearset numbers.

[Stormpeaks]

I'd like to think that it might be next on the radar after the recent super-expansion of gearset numbers.

"super expansion" lmao

yall really are happy with the most minuscule things that they do

[Heroman3003]

"super expansion" lmao

yall really are happy with the most minuscule things that they do

Yes. Sudden jump from 29 (was it 29? I forget) to 100 seems really out of the left field, when they could have done notably less (something like 50) and it would be recieved just as well. Frankly, I'm surprised they went for such unnecessarily high number, hence why I used hyperbole to refer to it.

[Stormpeaks]

Yes. Sudden jump from 29 (was it 29? I forget) to 100 seems really out of the left field, when they could have done notably less (something like 50) and it would be recieved just as well. Frankly, I'm surprised they went for such unnecessarily high number, hence why I used hyperbole to refer to it.

The day they put up glamour plates to a much bigger number, we'll get somewhere ,until then honestly its absolutely pointless because it's limited by inventory space, you can have 100 gear sets but you need to have the glamour pieces on you to swap out to them so it doesnt do anything at all

[Heroman3003]

The day they put up glamour plates to a much bigger number, we'll get somewhere ,until then honestly its absolutely pointless because it's limited by inventory space, you can have 100 gear sets but you need to have the glamour pieces on you to swap out to them so it doesnt do anything at all

Exactly. It seems pointless to go for such high number, hence my belief that it is a preparation for changes/expansion something else thats related to gearsets, and between Portraits and Glamour Plates, I doubt portraits are getting some significant alteration in regards to that.

[Iscah]

Yes. Sudden jump from 29 (was it 29? I forget) to 100 seems really out of the left field, when they could have done notably less (something like 50) and it would be recieved just as well. Frankly, I'm surprised they went for such unnecessarily high number, hence why I used hyperbole to refer to it.

The old number depended on how many classes and jobs you had unlocked.

My understanding is that they are stored client-side so they're basically free to add as many as they want and don't need to worry about server space for them, so they might as well go for the high number.

I've been using them to mark out gearsets I'm collecting so I don't accidentally hand them into the GC deposit.

[Mura-]

They are QoL things why wouldn't people be happy about small things if they make the game more enjoyable?