Linear, linear, linear

[TheMightyMollusk]

The first boss was waves of dull slow-spawning trash ending with one slightly stronger gigas. The second boss was a lot of standing around waiting for that bloody lever to turn back on. I don't miss either.

[Atelier-Bagur]

The first boss was waves of dull slow-spawning trash ending with one slightly stronger gigas. The second boss was a lot of standing around waiting for that bloody lever to turn back on. I don't miss either.

NOW GRANTED, if CBU3 actually kept with the unique boss encounter design where later boss fights were more than just tank and spank then yeah those old boss designs would've made sense to keep as tutorials even if they were were lame and boring.

Lets face it, the linearity didnt start with EW. Its started as soon as the game went to Heveansward as dungeons and bosses became more and more streamlined as the expansions rolled by. Is this a good thing? weeeelll part of me enjoys the consistency in content being simple and familiar to the point you dont need to whip out a wiki or dungeon guide to come prepared for every single dungeon and encounter in the game. That would get frustrating and old real fast, but I do wish they at least dabble in just a few twists here and there that still keep the encounters simple but give them something unique to it.

One notable example is the 2nd boss in Bardam's Mettle. I like the idea that the whole thing is just dodging its AoEs. Not every boss needs to be that subversive like that but its stuff like that I wish the team would explore at least for dungeon content

[R041]

Lets face it, the linearity didnt start with EW. Its started as soon as the game went to Heveansward

I'M GONNA SAY IT.. Heavensward sucked

*braces for impact*

Okay, not because it's a bad story. But because I think it being an expac garnered general attention and praise as the community itself grew, so CBU:III took that as the expac design being good. Then we kept boiling everything down as sub-versions of Heavensward. This is kinda also where they went "How can we be more different from WoW?" and it almost seemed like they were changing shit just to change shit regardless of it being good or bad.

Basically Heavensward is to ARR as ARR was to 1.0. We can argue the specifics, but we know that's basically true.

It has a lot of pros to me, but that came with a ton of cons too. :/

[kpxmanifesto]

I'M GONNA SAY IT.. Heavensward sucked

*braces for impact*

Okay, not because it's a bad story. But because I think it being an expac garnered general attention and praise as the community itself grew, so CBU:III took that as the expac design being good. Then we kept boiling everything down as sub-versions of Heavensward. This is kinda also where they went "How can we be more different from WoW?" and it almost seemed like they were changing shit just to change shit regardless of it being good or bad.

Basically Heavensward is to ARR as ARR was to 1.0. We can argue the specifics, but we know that's basically true.

It has a lot of pros to me, but that came with a ton of cons too. :/

Wow that's a bold opinion. I felt that a lot of the changes that came with HW were good ones and that the expac was a huge step up from ARR overall.

[R041]

Wow that's a bold opinion. I felt that a lot of the changes that came with HW were good ones and that the expac was a huge step up from ARR overall.

It's been pretty divisive I think.. It has a lot of good things, but also made a lot of sweeping changes to core systems and completely gutted a lot of personal expression in favor of streamlining everything. When you compare Heavensward to Endwalker, they're night and day of personal expression and RPG elements. But the same can be said for ARR to Heavensward.

I personally think they should have stayed on the path that ARR was heading, and they could have made the QoL changes we wanted in doing so. It was their own fault for locking critical abilities behind other secondary classes, so instead of balancing things out or making that experience easier - They opted to just destroy systems and put nothing in their place. This was the start of culling player self-expression, build capabilities, and RPG systems.

We say those things were bad, but they were only bad because CBU:III didn't balance them correctly. That kinda goes along with a lot of stuff they do. And we often conflate bad systems with it actually just being bad balance, and bad engagement.

Also the flying everywhere is absolutely egregious. You go from walking everywhere, and sometimes it takes a long time. To flying everywhere and it literally taking LONGER than it ever did walking in ARR. Because the maps are way too large.

Edit: Also, if anyone tries to say ARR content was bad while only experiencing it using classes and systems from HW+, that's because for the past 7 years or so we've been basically playing Checkers on a Chess board with half chess pieces and the car from Monopoly. So of course it's going to feel bad.

[kpxmanifesto]

I personally think they should have stayed on the path that ARR was heading, and they could have made the QoL changes we wanted in doing so. It was their own fault for locking critical abilities behind other secondary classes, so instead of balancing things out or making that experience easier - They opted to just destroy systems and put nothing in their place. This was the start of culling player self-expression, build capabilities, and RPG systems.

We say those things were bad, but they were only bad because CBU:III didn't balance them correctly. That kinda goes along with a lot of stuff they do. And we often conflate bad systems with it actually just being bad balance, and bad engagement.

Yeah, I remember being able to pick and choose which secondary class abilities you can have on your hotbar. It gave me some sense of being able to customize my playstyle and make it unique from others even though the difference would be minuscule. I feel what FFXIV really needed was a talent system, which brings its own set of problems, but nothing that was impossible to overcome.

Also the flying everywhere is absolutely egregious. You go from walking everywhere, and sometimes it takes a long time. To flying everywhere and it literally taking LONGER than it ever did walking in ARR. Because the maps are way too large.

This I actually liked, but to each their own, of course. I thought being able to fly across the entire map was awesome, and that the huge maps were fun to explore. I vaguely remember that's why SE decided to opt for larger map sizes - because players wanted larger and more open areas to explore.

[Shurrikhan]

It's been pretty divisive I think.. It has a lot of good things, but also made a lot of sweeping changes to core systems and completely gutted a lot of personal expression in favor of streamlining everything. When you compare Heavensward to Endwalker, they're night and day of personal expression and RPG elements. But the same can be said for ARR to Heavensward.

I personally think they should have stayed on the path that ARR was heading, and they could have made the QoL changes we wanted in doing so. It was their own fault for locking critical abilities behind other secondary classes, so instead of balancing things out or making that experience easier - They opted to just destroy systems and put nothing in their place. This was the start of culling player self-expression, build capabilities, and RPG systems.

So, real quick... not a single ARR ability was pruned in Heavensward. Nor did HW prune Additional Actions or Additional Attributes. That all didn't happen until Stormblood.

Moreover, "bad because CBU:III didn't balance them" is somewhat inherent to that particular system. A Fracture balanced for Monk, who needed an additional GCD fill per 18|21|30s (dependent on SkS threshold) and had a 40% damage bonus via Twin+GL, wasn't about to also be balanced also for Dragoon, unless you broke the whole point of the Additional Actions as being... a shared pool of actions (rather than individually job-tailored, at which point you have unique job skills that just occasionally share name, VFX, and animation).

I preferred a more horizontal progression approach and would have FAR preferred the Additionals (Actions, Attributes) be reiterated upon (by very different means) over abandoning the project after a single attempt, absolute. But, in practice, losing Additional Actions wasn't some huge loss to gameplay nor complexity (outside of that GCD gap not being filled for MNK until 4.3 via TK rotations, reducing its GCD speed options). Nor was losing Additional Attributes noticeable to anyone but BLM (from Piety tiers). (For everyone else, they were all non-choices.)

Also the flying everywhere is absolutely egregious. You go from walking everywhere, and sometimes it takes a long time. To flying everywhere and it literally taking LONGER than it ever did walking in ARR. Because the maps are way too large.

Agreed, though possibly for slightly different reasons.

I have absolutely no issue with maps being bigger. I felt most ARR zones were damn near immersion-breakingly claustrophobic. Even the likes of Gyr Albanian's Peaks zone doesn't seem too large, to me -- but merely underutilized.

But, the inclusion of flying, itself, was both jarring and lackluster. Give me a physics-based model of flight with limited Stamina and those 'Aether Currents' being real things that slightly highway the map (especially around tighter canyons, passes, etc.), and I'm sold. But instead we got the most basic form of flight possible, gated by a really jank gimmick (even if I do appreciate the exploration requirement prior to that unlock).

[Shurrikhan]

I feel what FFXIV really needed was a talent system, which brings its own set of problems, but nothing that was impossible to overcome.

Here's the thing: Customization (especially the likes of "Talent systems" outside of few exceptions like Rift) has historically almost always constrained gameplay options --replacing that gameplay with menu-play-- rather than expanding them. And I don't just mean this in a sense of "all choice is illusion" or similar BS; we don't all just play the 'best' job per sub-role.

Consider it this way. A game has n undermechanics that it must support player interaction with. Now, if there's limited button-counts and button-efficiency (e.g., Stormblood/Shadowbringers level button-bloat, where virtually none of the obvious opportunities for consolidation were taken), that can be bad, because each job's kit has to be able to engage with those undermechanics, even if with varying ease or directness, and that may leave less room for depth*.
*(Or, in XIV's case, sets of 3+ buttons to use all together or in rigid sequence as basically one action, which is more akin to rhythm-gaming than actual depth, but still.)

So, in this pre-specialized design scheme, every job, regardless of role, would want to be able (from within virtually any composition, without any prior role-allocation) to take some part in...

• manipulating enemy behavior,
• intercepting/thwarting attacks for allies at greater risk,
• crowd control,
• Stagger,
• suppression,
• timely defensives,
• Elemental systems,
• coordinating bursts of damage,
• knowing when at-cost uptime (standing in fire) is worth that cost,
• manipulating the costs of engagement,
• providing the resources to enlarge the range of viable options,
• etc., etc.

And while that may leave less room for your separate Senei and Guren, Shoha and Shoha II, Ikishoten and Namikiri buttons, etc... the job would tend to therefore have more that it can do and play with.

Now, let's specialize those jobs. A "Tank" becomes so much better than the rest at manipulating enemy behavior and defensives that everyone else's capacity for such becomes redundant as is trimmed shortly thereafter, regardless of their potentially serving a double-purpose; at best, only tiny little rhythmic bonuses remain (via Third Eye, Feint, etc.). A "Healer" makes so much better use of restoration that intercepting/thwarting attacks for more at risk allies, providing others with the resource for sustained or broader action, etc., likewise becomes, in majority, redundant.

The various gameplay elements that previously made a party-wide mechanic of reducing damage taken while maximizing output ("tanking") then becomes replaced by "a Tank exists". Matters of sustain and risk-calculation (with consequence) are largely replaced by "a Healer exists" (and simply the cost to their offensive ppgcd, since there will always be resource enough to heal you).

In pruning those now redundant 'versatility' tools, arguably there'd be room for more complex layering of one's rotation... but I have yet to see that ever be the result of pruning.

Now, that specialization would usually be called Roles, ofc, but that is essentially the endgame of customization: to be the best at something, which in turn tends to make everyone less "best"... redundant, essentially snapping any at-cost options towards very particular norms that section off gameplay.

That customization typically means no more of everyone having access to A, B, and C to any degree that'd promote coordination (as opposed to each working individually, but in proximity to each other -- without the weight of, say, this healing then being more or less worth on any basis but whether otherwise fatal damage would immediately follow, etc., etc.). Instead, A goes to Tanks, B goes to Healers, and C goes only to Damage-dealers.

Similarly, whenever Talent-based or similar customization allows for remotely excessive specialization, you end up with shit like... Single-target Execute damage goes to the Assassin builds of Ninja, forcing them for this particular fight A and out of B and C; Super-Flare build takes add fight B, but is barred from A and C; etc., etc.

Customization has, in short, a pretty fine edge between even slightly increasing net gameplay choice and significantly decreasing it, especially when concerned at all with what may be made obligatory (or, how many of those "choices" will, in practice, be non-choices). Part of why its so expensive to develop is exactly that: unless limited from the start to largely cosmetic changes, it can slip quickly from any sort of benefit to a net loss, which is not normally something desirable for a system that itself would come at significant development cost.

And yet, despite all that, I would like some further customization in this game. It's just very worth knowing how and why it can go wrong, often to the point of (relative to other models of gameplay expansion) letting players choose what little they want to keep, instead of choosing what they'd like to add.

That said, I don't think a Talent system (unless you're imagining it rather differently from the likes of WoW, GW2, Rift, etc.) would be a remotely efficient investment. I would suspect instead that a "All Jobs on One Character" game ought to leverage that for its customization, rather than creating a ton of sub-jobs (via those different builds) in isolation from each other.

[R041]

So, real quick... not a single ARR ability was pruned in Heavensward. Nor did HW prune Additional Actions or Additional Attributes. That all didn't happen until Stormblood.

Yeah I wouldn't say Heavensward destroyed classes exactly - It mostly added abilities for the individual classes, but then ignored the possibility of expanding the cross-class system itself. They kinda just stopped working on it altogether. It was the start of the formfactor we have today.

So Heavensward changed the environment, exploration systems, and dungeons mostly, then Stormblood finished it off with the class adjustments and cross-class destruction.

It was like a 1, 2 punch. lol

[thevanguard]

Wow that's a bold opinion. I felt that a lot of the changes that came with HW were good ones and that the expac was a huge step up from ARR overall.

HW started the trend of horrible open world design and has probably the worst open world maps in this game. Azys Lla, half of Sea of Clouds, half of Dravanian Forelands, basically the entire Coerthan West; they all are incredibly empty and pointless, and many are just huge squares.

HW maps are practically just ARR maps except you stretch the points of interest far apart and color the void with AI-generated terrain paint. All the subsequent expansions are no different. I would say it's the worst open world maps I've ever played but that would be a lie because there's Assassin's Creed Valhalla.

There is literally more lore, ambient NPCs, points of interest packed in an ARR map vs. HW despite the HW one being like four times larger or something. ARR maps feel like places people lived in and engaged with (like hot springs, empty huts, cerulean pipe lines). HW maps feel like going to Antarctica and being disappointed it's literally just a blank void.

If they can't fill the open world with enough points of interest just make the map smaller and denser and spend more resources on making interesting terrain (like Eureka Pagos)