Page 15 of 20 FirstFirst ... 5 13 14 15 16 17 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 192
  1. #141
    Player
    TheDecay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    169
    Character
    Gabon Decay
    World
    Marilith
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by CerusSerenade View Post
    This misconception that non-linear is somehow always superior to a linear game needs to die. There are plenty of linear games that have proven to be masterpieces.
    Like???

    God of War?

    And how did they make their linear dungeons? With puzzles. Alternating paths. Varied enemies that require the player to use different tactics. Environmental interactions. Verticality. I can go on and on. All of these, FF14 and FF16 have not achieved.

    That's why GoW is a 94 and a 9.1 in User Score while FF16 has a 7.9 User Score.

    Because they mastered the art of non-linear design in linear dungeons: that is, breaking the gameplay loop into chunks of walk forward, do puzzle, attack enemy, dodge, interact with environment, attack enemy, do puzzle, find hidden path etc. What you're actually engaged in while in a GoW dungeon that is actually incredibly linear when you look at the map, is highly non-linear gameplay.

    What is there in FF14/FF16? Press W and smash Square/AoE combo.
    (8)
    Last edited by TheDecay; 06-29-2023 at 12:30 PM.
    Dealing with bad-faith forum posters who tell you to quit or say your concern is in the minority:
    1. Do not engage in their bad-faith attacks.
    2. Warn others of their bad-faith if they have a long history of it.
    3. Continue the productive conversation and silently report them for personal attacks.
    Be firm but polite, recognize their tactics and don't fall into their traps.

  2. #142
    Player Ransu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Leaving my SAM in Kugane
    Posts
    2,948
    Character
    Raansu Omiyari
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Samurai Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDecay View Post
    Like???

    God of War?

    And how did they make their linear dungeons? With puzzles. Alternating paths. Varied enemies that require the player to use different tactics. Environmental interactions. Verticality. I can go on and on. All of these, FF14 and FF16 have not achieved.

    That's why GoW is a 94 and a 9.1 in User Score while FF16 has a 7.9 User Score.

    Because they mastered the art of non-linear design in linear dungeons: that is, breaking the gameplay loop into chunks of walk forward, do puzzle, attack enemy, dodge, interact with environment, attack enemy, do puzzle, find hidden path etc. What you're actually engaged in while in a GoW dungeon that is actually incredibly linear when you look at the map, is highly non-linear gameplay.

    What is there in FF14/FF16? Press W and smash Square/AoE combo.
    User scores on metacritic are a waste of time. A big chunk of the FFXVI user reviews are dumb console warring people review bombing it along with a weird section of people that seem to hate Nomura and somehow think he was involved with FFXVI and its "kingdom heart nonsense" story.
    (6)

  3. #143
    Player R041's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    938
    Character
    Oidi Grey
    World
    Marilith
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Atelier-Bagur View Post
    Lets face it, the linearity didnt start with EW. Its started as soon as the game went to Heveansward
    I'M GONNA SAY IT.. Heavensward sucked

    *braces for impact*

    Okay, not because it's a bad story. But because I think it being an expac garnered general attention and praise as the community itself grew, so CBU:III took that as the expac design being good. Then we kept boiling everything down as sub-versions of Heavensward. This is kinda also where they went "How can we be more different from WoW?" and it almost seemed like they were changing shit just to change shit regardless of it being good or bad.

    Basically Heavensward is to ARR as ARR was to 1.0. We can argue the specifics, but we know that's basically true.

    It has a lot of pros to me, but that came with a ton of cons too. :/
    (1)
    Last edited by R041; 06-29-2023 at 11:46 PM.

  4. #144
    Player kpxmanifesto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,037
    Character
    Last Starfighter
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by R041 View Post
    I'M GONNA SAY IT.. Heavensward sucked

    *braces for impact*

    Okay, not because it's a bad story. But because I think it being an expac garnered general attention and praise as the community itself grew, so CBU:III took that as the expac design being good. Then we kept boiling everything down as sub-versions of Heavensward. This is kinda also where they went "How can we be more different from WoW?" and it almost seemed like they were changing shit just to change shit regardless of it being good or bad.

    Basically Heavensward is to ARR as ARR was to 1.0. We can argue the specifics, but we know that's basically true.

    It has a lot of pros to me, but that came with a ton of cons too. :/
    Wow that's a bold opinion. I felt that a lot of the changes that came with HW were good ones and that the expac was a huge step up from ARR overall.
    (2)

  5. #145
    Player R041's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    938
    Character
    Oidi Grey
    World
    Marilith
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by kpxmanifesto View Post
    Wow that's a bold opinion. I felt that a lot of the changes that came with HW were good ones and that the expac was a huge step up from ARR overall.
    It's been pretty divisive I think.. It has a lot of good things, but also made a lot of sweeping changes to core systems and completely gutted a lot of personal expression in favor of streamlining everything. When you compare Heavensward to Endwalker, they're night and day of personal expression and RPG elements. But the same can be said for ARR to Heavensward.

    I personally think they should have stayed on the path that ARR was heading, and they could have made the QoL changes we wanted in doing so. It was their own fault for locking critical abilities behind other secondary classes, so instead of balancing things out or making that experience easier - They opted to just destroy systems and put nothing in their place. This was the start of culling player self-expression, build capabilities, and RPG systems.

    We say those things were bad, but they were only bad because CBU:III didn't balance them correctly. That kinda goes along with a lot of stuff they do. And we often conflate bad systems with it actually just being bad balance, and bad engagement.

    Also the flying everywhere is absolutely egregious. You go from walking everywhere, and sometimes it takes a long time. To flying everywhere and it literally taking LONGER than it ever did walking in ARR. Because the maps are way too large.

    Edit: Also, if anyone tries to say ARR content was bad while only experiencing it using classes and systems from HW+, that's because for the past 7 years or so we've been basically playing Checkers on a Chess board with half chess pieces and the car from Monopoly. So of course it's going to feel bad.
    (5)
    Last edited by R041; 06-30-2023 at 03:11 AM.

  6. #146
    Player
    Catwho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    2,766
    Character
    Katarh Mest
    World
    Lamia
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Hurlstone View Post
    Open world does not always make for a better experience, personally speaking the open world element actively put me off games like Dragon Age Inquisition. Currently playing and really enjoying FFXVI, and I like that its a more linear experience... that said, I do have issues with it. There is enough space in most maps to explore but it often feels unworthy to do so unless you have a quest, and tiresome before you get a mount. What rewards you do find from going off the path are little more then crafting items, and given how weak that system is in the game, its unfortunate. Perhaps it will change when I am deeper into the game.
    I found a few hidden side paths that were not obvious until I was trying to track down a hunt for a quest. I was forced to open the map and stare at them because the quest called out a location I hadn't unlocked, despite being in that area multiple times for MSQ.

    There were two tiny little paths leading off the field area.

    I went down the first one and ran face first into an S rank hunt mob. NOPE NOPE NOPE NOT WHAT I WAS HERE FOR lol

    Finally found the second missing one that had the name of the area I was looking for, and killed the B rank I'd actually been after.

    I'm sure there's tons of tiny little hidden pockets in the field areas like that I missed. That's why you get an achievement for unlocking all the maps by the end of the game.
    (0)

  7. #147
    Player kpxmanifesto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,037
    Character
    Last Starfighter
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by R041 View Post
    I personally think they should have stayed on the path that ARR was heading, and they could have made the QoL changes we wanted in doing so. It was their own fault for locking critical abilities behind other secondary classes, so instead of balancing things out or making that experience easier - They opted to just destroy systems and put nothing in their place. This was the start of culling player self-expression, build capabilities, and RPG systems.

    We say those things were bad, but they were only bad because CBU:III didn't balance them correctly. That kinda goes along with a lot of stuff they do. And we often conflate bad systems with it actually just being bad balance, and bad engagement.
    Yeah, I remember being able to pick and choose which secondary class abilities you can have on your hotbar. It gave me some sense of being able to customize my playstyle and make it unique from others even though the difference would be minuscule. I feel what FFXIV really needed was a talent system, which brings its own set of problems, but nothing that was impossible to overcome.

    Quote Originally Posted by R041 View Post
    Also the flying everywhere is absolutely egregious. You go from walking everywhere, and sometimes it takes a long time. To flying everywhere and it literally taking LONGER than it ever did walking in ARR. Because the maps are way too large.
    This I actually liked, but to each their own, of course. I thought being able to fly across the entire map was awesome, and that the huge maps were fun to explore. I vaguely remember that's why SE decided to opt for larger map sizes - because players wanted larger and more open areas to explore.
    (7)

  8. #148
    Player
    Shurrikhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,819
    Character
    Tani Shirai
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by R041 View Post
    It's been pretty divisive I think.. It has a lot of good things, but also made a lot of sweeping changes to core systems and completely gutted a lot of personal expression in favor of streamlining everything. When you compare Heavensward to Endwalker, they're night and day of personal expression and RPG elements. But the same can be said for ARR to Heavensward.

    I personally think they should have stayed on the path that ARR was heading, and they could have made the QoL changes we wanted in doing so. It was their own fault for locking critical abilities behind other secondary classes, so instead of balancing things out or making that experience easier - They opted to just destroy systems and put nothing in their place. This was the start of culling player self-expression, build capabilities, and RPG systems.
    So, real quick... not a single ARR ability was pruned in Heavensward. Nor did HW prune Additional Actions or Additional Attributes. That all didn't happen until Stormblood.

    Moreover, "bad because CBU:III didn't balance them" is somewhat inherent to that particular system. A Fracture balanced for Monk, who needed an additional GCD fill per 18|21|30s (dependent on SkS threshold) and had a 40% damage bonus via Twin+GL, wasn't about to also be balanced also for Dragoon, unless you broke the whole point of the Additional Actions as being... a shared pool of actions (rather than individually job-tailored, at which point you have unique job skills that just occasionally share name, VFX, and animation).

    I preferred a more horizontal progression approach and would have FAR preferred the Additionals (Actions, Attributes) be reiterated upon (by very different means) over abandoning the project after a single attempt, absolute. But, in practice, losing Additional Actions wasn't some huge loss to gameplay nor complexity (outside of that GCD gap not being filled for MNK until 4.3 via TK rotations, reducing its GCD speed options). Nor was losing Additional Attributes noticeable to anyone but BLM (from Piety tiers). (For everyone else, they were all non-choices.)

    Quote Originally Posted by R041 View Post
    Also the flying everywhere is absolutely egregious. You go from walking everywhere, and sometimes it takes a long time. To flying everywhere and it literally taking LONGER than it ever did walking in ARR. Because the maps are way too large.
    Agreed, though possibly for slightly different reasons.

    I have absolutely no issue with maps being bigger. I felt most ARR zones were damn near immersion-breakingly claustrophobic. Even the likes of Gyr Albanian's Peaks zone doesn't seem too large, to me -- but merely underutilized.

    But, the inclusion of flying, itself, was both jarring and lackluster. Give me a physics-based model of flight with limited Stamina and those 'Aether Currents' being real things that slightly highway the map (especially around tighter canyons, passes, etc.), and I'm sold. But instead we got the most basic form of flight possible, gated by a really jank gimmick (even if I do appreciate the exploration requirement prior to that unlock).
    (1)
    Last edited by Shurrikhan; 06-30-2023 at 05:39 AM.

  9. #149
    Player
    Shurrikhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,819
    Character
    Tani Shirai
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by kpxmanifesto View Post
    I feel what FFXIV really needed was a talent system, which brings its own set of problems, but nothing that was impossible to overcome.
    Here's the thing: Customization (especially the likes of "Talent systems" outside of few exceptions like Rift) has historically almost always constrained gameplay options --replacing that gameplay with menu-play-- rather than expanding them. And I don't just mean this in a sense of "all choice is illusion" or similar BS; we don't all just play the 'best' job per sub-role.

    Consider it this way. A game has n undermechanics that it must support player interaction with. Now, if there's limited button-counts and button-efficiency (e.g., Stormblood/Shadowbringers level button-bloat, where virtually none of the obvious opportunities for consolidation were taken), that can be bad, because each job's kit has to be able to engage with those undermechanics, even if with varying ease or directness, and that may leave less room for depth*.
    *(Or, in XIV's case, sets of 3+ buttons to use all together or in rigid sequence as basically one action, which is more akin to rhythm-gaming than actual depth, but still.)

    So, in this pre-specialized design scheme, every job, regardless of role, would want to be able (from within virtually any composition, without any prior role-allocation) to take some part in...
    • manipulating enemy behavior,
    • intercepting/thwarting attacks for allies at greater risk,
    • crowd control,
    • Stagger,
    • suppression,
    • timely defensives,
    • Elemental systems,
    • coordinating bursts of damage,
    • knowing when at-cost uptime (standing in fire) is worth that cost,
    • manipulating the costs of engagement,
    • providing the resources to enlarge the range of viable options,
    • etc., etc.

    And while that may leave less room for your separate Senei and Guren, Shoha and Shoha II, Ikishoten and Namikiri buttons, etc... the job would tend to therefore have more that it can do and play with.

    Now, let's specialize those jobs. A "Tank" becomes so much better than the rest at manipulating enemy behavior and defensives that everyone else's capacity for such becomes redundant as is trimmed shortly thereafter, regardless of their potentially serving a double-purpose; at best, only tiny little rhythmic bonuses remain (via Third Eye, Feint, etc.). A "Healer" makes so much better use of restoration that intercepting/thwarting attacks for more at risk allies, providing others with the resource for sustained or broader action, etc., likewise becomes, in majority, redundant.

    The various gameplay elements that previously made a party-wide mechanic of reducing damage taken while maximizing output ("tanking") then becomes replaced by "a Tank exists". Matters of sustain and risk-calculation (with consequence) are largely replaced by "a Healer exists" (and simply the cost to their offensive ppgcd, since there will always be resource enough to heal you).

    In pruning those now redundant 'versatility' tools, arguably there'd be room for more complex layering of one's rotation... but I have yet to see that ever be the result of pruning.

    Now, that specialization would usually be called Roles, ofc, but that is essentially the endgame of customization: to be the best at something, which in turn tends to make everyone less "best"... redundant, essentially snapping any at-cost options towards very particular norms that section off gameplay.

    That customization typically means no more of everyone having access to A, B, and C to any degree that'd promote coordination (as opposed to each working individually, but in proximity to each other -- without the weight of, say, this healing then being more or less worth on any basis but whether otherwise fatal damage would immediately follow, etc., etc.). Instead, A goes to Tanks, B goes to Healers, and C goes only to Damage-dealers.

    Similarly, whenever Talent-based or similar customization allows for remotely excessive specialization, you end up with shit like... Single-target Execute damage goes to the Assassin builds of Ninja, forcing them for this particular fight A and out of B and C; Super-Flare build takes add fight B, but is barred from A and C; etc., etc.

    Customization has, in short, a pretty fine edge between even slightly increasing net gameplay choice and significantly decreasing it, especially when concerned at all with what may be made obligatory (or, how many of those "choices" will, in practice, be non-choices). Part of why its so expensive to develop is exactly that: unless limited from the start to largely cosmetic changes, it can slip quickly from any sort of benefit to a net loss, which is not normally something desirable for a system that itself would come at significant development cost.

    And yet, despite all that, I would like some further customization in this game. It's just very worth knowing how and why it can go wrong, often to the point of (relative to other models of gameplay expansion) letting players choose what little they want to keep, instead of choosing what they'd like to add.

    That said, I don't think a Talent system (unless you're imagining it rather differently from the likes of WoW, GW2, Rift, etc.) would be a remotely efficient investment. I would suspect instead that a "All Jobs on One Character" game ought to leverage that for its customization, rather than creating a ton of sub-jobs (via those different builds) in isolation from each other.
    (1)

  10. #150
    Player R041's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    938
    Character
    Oidi Grey
    World
    Marilith
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Shurrikhan View Post
    So, real quick... not a single ARR ability was pruned in Heavensward. Nor did HW prune Additional Actions or Additional Attributes. That all didn't happen until Stormblood.
    Yeah I wouldn't say Heavensward destroyed classes exactly - It mostly added abilities for the individual classes, but then ignored the possibility of expanding the cross-class system itself. They kinda just stopped working on it altogether. It was the start of the formfactor we have today.

    So Heavensward changed the environment, exploration systems, and dungeons mostly, then Stormblood finished it off with the class adjustments and cross-class destruction.

    It was like a 1, 2 punch. lol
    (0)
    Last edited by R041; 06-30-2023 at 06:47 AM.

Page 15 of 20 FirstFirst ... 5 13 14 15 16 17 ... LastLast