Battle High has overstayed its welcome

[Valence]

Reducing the damage reduction for BH players sounds reasonable, as well as increasing the amount of tactical points scored when downing them (which is the better of the two in order to generate a loser's advantage and catchup mechanics, because the ones we have right now are definitely not doing their job well at all).

[anna-steele]

i like battle high it gives me more damage

[Kathleen_]

Nerfing the innate DR as your BH progresses will just make ranged jobs even more useless than they are now. Either increase the points you get per kill (+1 per BH level) or just halve the damage/healing buff. Or just leave BH as it is now, because it's fine.

[Knot_D]

IMO, it should work like Feast's carrying medal penalty. The more BH you get, less DR as the penalty

[Guesswhat]

Yes, great idea, even less incentive to actually PvP. Never heard of a better complaint. SE, make it happen.

IMO, it should work like Feast's carrying medal penalty. The more BH you get, less DR as the penalty

This idea is even better, no incentive to PvP + if you're actually PvPing, punish them.

[Knot_D]

Yes, great idea, even less incentive to actually PvP. Never heard of a better complaint. SE, make it happen.



This idea is even better, no incentive to PvP + if you're actually PvPing, punish them.

Of course you should punish those people with BH5, like how they used to punish battle high and fever guy with their location shown at map. Why would they stay strong for entire game?

[Malganis_L]

would be cool, if battle high becomes more of a alliance or group buff, that increase point gain and loss through kills and objectives by BH%,
instead of the somewhat idiotic system where those who get it, technicly dont need it, and those who probably would need it dont get it.
its basicly a win more mechanic in its purest form at the moment....
also than Damage resistances can be slightly nerfed again.