Look, it’s one thing to blame SE for not addressing P12S bug sooner, another to describe previous hotfix as “irrelevant.”First I wasn't even referencing that. I'm talking about repair "exploit" which is a total non-issue.
Second, literally no one died because they jumped during webs. That's a total non-issue because you go into specific spots to solve it anyways. you don't need to see it to know what to do??? Just go on the pole lmao
Like bruh just do the fight and this is so obvious as to which bugs are important and which aren't
If some of major bugs had already been addressed, it stands to reason they uploaded their patch ASAP. Just because “nobody wipes” doesn’t mean they should procrastinate their finished patch just to suit your “ but muh is more important.”
And no, I think the issues addressed in the previous hotfix are not irrelevant.
sprinting still eats dual cast
yall better get a chair
Only I have never said this. Ever."I don't care, as long as it doesn't affect me."
Here is truth, now and always.
There is not one game, one piece of software in the whole of existence, that does not have bugs, glitches, flaws, you name it. You can run a piece of software for years, then have a major flaw undetected and unknown bug appear out of nowhere.
I was part of a special project about five years before I retired, updating an old network system program as part of a larger mainframe upgrade. The software was tried and tested, theyd had it for years. Zero problems. Until what the NOC director called a time bomb glitch froze EVERY SINGLE TERMINAL in the entire building in the space of seconds.
It took them five hours to narrow the issue down and implement a fix.
Add in all kinds of hardware and you have problems literally WAITING to happen. No warning. No indication it is going to happen until it does.
Bugs happen. Issues happen. If you havent worked that out by now, I cant help you.
Only I have never said this. Ever.
Here is truth, now and always.
There is not one game, one piece of software in the whole of existence, that does not have bugs, glitches, flaws, you name it. You can run a piece of software for years, then have a major flaw undetected and unknown bug appear out of nowhere.
I was part of a special project about five years before I retired, updating an old network system program as part of a larger mainframe upgrade. The software was tried and tested, theyd had it for years. Zero problems. Until what the NOC director called a time bomb glitch froze EVERY SINGLE TERMINAL in the entire building in the space of seconds.
It took them five hours to narrow the issue down and implement a fix.
Add in all kinds of hardware and you have problems literally WAITING to happen. No warning. No indication it is going to happen until it does.
Bugs happen. Issues happen. If you havent worked that out by now, I cant help you.![]()
Do you guys not have other games?
This is about how fast bugs are fixed. If you havent worked that out by now, I cant help you.
Will put you on ignore if you can't form a logical argument but argue nonetheless
"I want it fixed NAO". Doesnt work that way, never has, never will. Again, you dont fix bugs on the fly with a halfbaked "workaround" that may cause more issues later.This is about how fast bugs are fixed. If you havent worked that out by now, I cant help you.
Get real.
Or you do QA testing and then those bugs dont happen
No way
And before you tell me "BUGS ARE MEANT TO HAPPEN !!!", yes, small bugs are meant to happen, not game breaking bugs in the highest tier of content in the game.
Just like the whole housing fiasco with the winner being number 0, those things are not small bugs, and if there was testing it would have been noticed.
Btw as a little reminder, it took over a month IIRC for the housing fix to come out, how is that acceptable ?
Last edited by Stormpeaks; 06-07-2023 at 09:53 PM.
even Q&A cannot catch all bugs. thats unrealistic since Q&A is not testing on a live server.Or you do QA testing and then those bugs dont happen
No way
And before you tell me "BUGS ARE MEANT TO HAPPEN !!!", yes, small bugs are meant to happen, not game breaking bugs in the highest tier of content in the game.
Just like the whole housing fiasco with the winner being number 0, those things are not small bugs, and if there was testing it would have been noticed.
from what appears to happen, its when the servers are under load according to the release, which since they did not say what kind of load, its likely the devs had to go over logs to try and determine how it happens and may not have been able to be replicated in their test environment. Since it has been cleared, clearly it was not happening 100% of the time, which are some of the hardest bugs to root out. the devs where I work see this with our software, and its called "unintended application". It cannot really be "tested" because its not a workflow the devs OR Q&A had thought of or would use. could they have caught it? sure, maybe, the number 0 one, most likely, this one I am not so sure because the test server, no matter how close you make it to live, will never be a live server.
Yeah sure, literally number 0 winning couldnt have been caught beforehand, alright lmaoeven Q&A cannot catch all bugs. thats unrealistic since Q&A is not testing on a live server.
from what appears to happen, its when the servers are under load according to the release, which since they did not say what kind of load, its likely the devs had to go over logs to try and determine how it happens and may not have been able to be replicated in their test environment. Since it has been cleared, clearly it was not happening 100% of the time, which are some of the hardest bugs to root out. the devs where I work see this with our software, and its called "unintended application". It cannot really be "tested" because its not a workflow the devs OR Q&A had thought of or would use. could they have caught it? sure, maybe, the number 0 one, most likely, this one I am not so sure because the test server, no matter how close you make it to live, will never be a live server.
There is a thing called QA testing, maybe they should try that and actually play the content they put out to make sure it works properly, small bugs are fine, those bugs are not small.
Considering your past posts in response to me, I think I will put you back where you were before which is the ignore list since obviously you cant behave and talk like a normal human beingNot trying to completely excuse bugs that occur anyway but you must be living in lala-land if you seriously believe that in the history of video games there never was a game breaking bug or two in every single product ever.
It clearly shows your blatant ignorance over the issues if you believe just waving things with a magic wand and everyone in the team being able to catch every issue in the game.
Besides you dont even seriously care about the game anyway. Go back to your little gingerbread house or whatever and stop pretending like you actually give a damn about the game.
adios
Last edited by Stormpeaks; 06-07-2023 at 10:09 PM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.