Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 45

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player Ivtrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    959
    Character
    Ivtrix Impreria
    World
    Goblin
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 90
    No reason not to support this

    I wanna be a tanky looking war caster pls SE
    (2)

  2. #2
    Player SassyAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Fanow
    Posts
    1,905
    Character
    Cinnabun Arulaq
    World
    Louisoix
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 100
    Agreed, everything but AF
    (6)

  3. #3
    Player
    Atelier-Bagur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    3,980
    Character
    Cordelia Emery
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 82
    Everything including AF
    (2)

  4. #4
    Player
    MaxCarnage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    391
    Character
    Adiah Highborn
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 52
    They should also untie the level requirement for glamour. I shouldn't have to be all 90s to be able to wear any piece of gear as glamour.

    I really don't understand why they went the route of tying glamour restrictions to equipment restrictions. I guess one could argue laziness or money saving or both. But with the reworks they have already given the glamour chest, I hope they will work on untying glam from equipment restrctions
    (3)

  5. #5
    Player NekoMataMata's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    1,849
    Character
    Feline Good
    World
    Halicarnassus
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by vanaii View Post
    When you say it like that, yeah. I have to agree-- though AF 100% needs to be job locked. It's meant to be iconic. If you can have a bikini tank, you might as well have platemail dancers.
    In addition to AF gear, perhaps it would be good to lock the gear relating to the current expansion or patch as well. So, for instance if 7.0 were to come out, then 7.0 gear would be glam locked. Then on 7.1 release all gear from that expansion release is unlocked, while anything released during 7.1 is locked. 7.2 release unlocks all 7.1 while 7.2 is locked and so forth.

    This would give people time to really appreciate the gear on each release, but also give you something to look forward to.

    Quote Originally Posted by MaxCarnage View Post
    They should also untie the level requirement for glamour. I shouldn't have to be all 90s to be able to wear any piece of gear as glamour.

    I really don't understand why they went the route of tying glamour restrictions to equipment restrictions. I guess one could argue laziness or money saving or both. But with the reworks they have already given the glamour chest, I hope they will work on untying glam from equipment restrctions
    I disagree with this. You should have to earn your glamour to some amount. I would prefer it if they allowed you to glam anything as long as you had the level to equip it, but I don't think we should go further than that. You shouldn't be able to unlock every class/job and immediately glam every item without having the level to equip those items.
    (1)
    Last edited by NekoMataMata; 06-07-2023 at 08:20 PM.

  6. #6
    Player
    Raikai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    3,502
    Character
    Arlo Nine-tails
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 90
    I won't even get into the thing that we can already glam those hundreds of cosmetic only items to bypass the alleged silhouette excuse...

    But if you stop for a hot minute and analyze the art direction of the items they put out every patch... There's no cohesion or commitment with the whole amor weight fantasy.

    Half of the most recent fending sets don't even look like heavy armor. Sometimes straight up fabric that would otherwise fit a caster (Pandaemonium 1), sometimes other jobs get tank looking gear (Aglaia). So yeah, the art direction is defnitely not working under a briefing that emphasizes cohesion with armor weights.

    The glamour restrictions only make sense to artifact sets, which are about the only consistent thing because it ties with the job fantasy directly.
    (2)

  7. #7
    Player Soge01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    2,406
    Character
    Waira Amarilla
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 100
    This would be nice.
    (1)

  8. #8
    Player
    Aco505's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    861
    Character
    Aco Nale
    World
    Moogle
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 100
    We should also be able to glam an item regardless of level as long as you can equip both items. It's a pain to adjust plates and glamors for level 70 or 80 duties like Eureka or ultimates.

    I wrote about it here, in case anyone is interested.

    There's also a thread requesting glam restrictions to be removed here, if you want to show your support.
    (0)

  9. #9
    Player
    Atelier-Bagur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    3,980
    Character
    Cordelia Emery
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 82
    Quote Originally Posted by NekoMataMata View Post
    In addition to AF gear, perhaps it would be good to lock the gear relating to the current expansion or patch as well. So, for instance if 7.0 were to come out, then 7.0 gear would be glam locked. Then on 7.1 release all gear from that expansion release is unlocked, while anything released during 7.1 is locked. 7.2 release unlocks all 7.1 while 7.2 is locked and so forth.

    This would give people time to really appreciate the gear on each release, but also give you something to look forward to.



    I disagree with this. You should have to earn your glamour to some amount. I would prefer it if they allowed you to glam anything as long as you had the level to equip it, but I don't think we should go further than that. You shouldn't be able to unlock every class/job and immediately glam every item without having the level to equip those items.
    Not particularly a strong case as other MMOs with superior transmog systems doesnt lock level restrictions and people are generally happy and fine. Heck I think even FFXI; the previous MMO had less restrictions on what items your allowed go style lock.

    Why should FFXIV have to limit themselves? I say let people have fun with the system. I for one believe itll make a lot of people happy for it with relatively little to no consequence at all.
    (0)

  10. #10
    Player NekoMataMata's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    1,849
    Character
    Feline Good
    World
    Halicarnassus
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Atelier-Bagur View Post
    Not particularly a strong case as other MMOs with superior transmog systems doesnt lock level restrictions and people are generally happy and fine. Heck I think even FFXI; the previous MMO had less restrictions on what items your allowed go style lock.

    Why should FFXIV have to limit themselves? I say let people have fun with the system. I for one believe itll make a lot of people happy for it with relatively little to no consequence at all.
    Well, the idea of restricting it based on latest expansion/patch release is to save people from themselves. Gear during the latest expansion/patch release is actually useful as gear. While you should always have the need option ready for anything pertaining to your class, things could still get a bit toxic.

    As for the level restrictions... this is FFXIV, not other MMOs. That's just pure whataboutism. This is a game at the end of the day, and I don't think it's unfair to ask people to play the content in order to receive the rewards, cosmetic or otherwise.

    Again, I'm saying this with the idea that glam restrictions are loosened a bit(before someone who doesn't know how to read gets other ideas)., but if you want to glam the healer top then go play a healer. If you want to glam the pally pants go play a tank. If you want to glam anything pertaining to any dps go play that role.

    Assuming they removed glam restrictions by role, I don't think it'd be asking much to ask people to have to be able to actually equip the items they want to glam, even if the glam is for other jobs. It gives people something to aim for and makes them play the game. If we're not willing to add a condition like that, then we genuinely just need to accept that this game is going to be a SL/Imvu sim instead.
    (2)

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast