Please buff AST

[Renathras]

Going for technicalities is irrelevant.

Again, replace with IRS audits. Have you ever been audited? Do you personally know anyone who has?

Or really technical legal violations. Have you ever been prosecuted for lying on the form to buy a gun? Do you personally know anyone who has?

We can keep going, but sooner or later, I will get to a thing that happens, and happens somewhat frequently, that you have not had happen to you nor know someone personally it's happened to nor know of anyone even not-personally it's happened to.

Trying to debate the specific example of the specific crime is irrelevant, the point was obvious. So obvious trying to fight over it is beyond stupid, so I'm not going to bother doing it. You have to be willfully obtuse to think that the specific crime is relevant to the example, and you aren't stupid, Sebazy. You know the point. You can disagree with the point, but you can't disagree with the reality that some things happen, and even happen frequently, that are not widely known or discussed by large portions of the population. You're smart, you get the point of what I was saying, yet twice you've tried to argue about the specific crimes mentioned and how easy or hard they are to detect or know about, which was 100% irrelevant and you know it's irrelevant since you're smart enough to understand the general premise I was trying to convey.

That's the kinda stuff here that frustrates me. Many of you do this, and I have no idea for the life of me why, since you guys are smart enough to understand what I'm trying to say, you just choose not to for some ungodly reason.

And for what it's worth, a favorite strawman of this very subforum is the "Cure1 spammer" or "Medica spammer" - you know, a Healer using/overusing GCD heals instead of using those GCDs for dealing damage. "But that's different!", it's the same thing. IT feeds into the same perception. It's the same thing as the people who will say "You only got a gray, you don't get to have a say in this discussion" stuff.

.

If you had an issue with Zeastria's comment, you should have taken that up with her.

The fact you replied to me, specifically, to try and call me out, when I'm right, is what makes you wrong.

Once more, I wasn't arguing Zeastria's comment.

Zeastria's comment is thus irrelevant to whether or not you chose to call me out.

_I_ was calling Nizzi's comment that it NEVER happens ("doesn't happen" being the wording used) as false. And it is 100% false. I know it is, because it's happened in parties I've been in. By definition, that is cases of it happening. By definition, that makes the statement it never/doesn't happen false.

If you want to say Zeastria's comment is false, that's fine - tell her, not me.

If you're saying I'm wrong in saying Nizzi's statement is false, that means you're saying Nizzi's statement was true. But Nizzi's statement was false. So if you're doing that, you're wrong.

.

EDIT:

I'm not going to sit here and say that it never happens,...

This is literally what I was saying when you called me out.

That's it.

So you saying it now means you agree with me and what I said, since that's literally what I was saying, in which case you shouldn't have called me out over it in the first place. And that's all I'm going to say over it. This conversation is just not worth continuing at this point.

[ForsakenRoe]

I don't think this even qualifies as a conversation in the first place