why the devs take the lazy way out on low lvl content scaling?

[Jeeqbit]

why as we go lower that current level content we lose skills.

Because you are doing... lower level content that is not designed to withstand level 90 abilities. With lower level players who don't have all your fancy level 90 abilities. If you don't like it, just do level 90 content.

as of lvl 90 any thing under lvl 60 is close to not playable

That isn't the least bit true.

[magitekLuna]

Because you are doing... lower level content that is not designed to withstand level 90 abilities. With lower level players who don't have all your fancy level 90 abilities. If you don't like it, just do level 90 content.

That isn't the least bit true.

but then where the excuse you people use all the time of so much old content you can have fun in? as to "That isn't the least bit true." some classes don't have aoe under 50 now. the more lvls we get the less classes build for lower lvl content.

[DragonFlyy]

but then where the excuse you people use all the time of so much old content you can have fun in? as to "That isn't the least bit true." some classes don't have aoe under 50 now. the more lvls we get the less classes build for lower lvl content.

Everquest 2 did the downscale level and gear but kept all the skills. A level 80 character sync'd to level 30 could solo a level 50 dungeon because of the skills. It was kinda annoying. This system works better in keeping people playing together.

As to your "unplayable", I can still do Sastasha on any class, so not unplayable.