The rest of the body doesn't match up with hers tho.



The rest of the body doesn't match up with hers tho.
Maybe it's the shadow dragon from the same game Golbez is from? Doesn't need to be the same dragon as Azdaja.
We will fight Golbez, he's gonna summon this shadow dragon, just as an enemy to beat without much story to it other than well he knows what dragons are through Azdaja, second phase is Golbez proper, we beat his ass and then we rescue Azdaja, maybe she has enough power left to live.
Sounds pretty straightforward to me. Don't put more thought into this than the writers.



I think you're grossly underestimating the writers. They don't just do 'here is the reference, now clap'; they recognize the value of said reference, but they do try to weave it into the world itself so that it matters a bit more than that--and crucially, so that it has any storytelling value at all to the people who haven't played the source game.Maybe it's the shadow dragon from the same game Golbez is from? Doesn't need to be the same dragon as Azdaja.
We will fight Golbez, he's gonna summon this shadow dragon, just as an enemy to beat without much story to it other than well he knows what dragons are through Azdaja, second phase is Golbez proper, we beat his ass and then we rescue Azdaja, maybe she has enough power left to live.
Sounds pretty straightforward to me. Don't put more thought into this than the writers.
XIV Golbez absolutely, from a development and marketing perspective, has a shadow dragon because IV Golbez has a shadow dragon. But they very clearly intend it to be deeper than that; dragons are a relatively special thing in XIV, so he can't just have one with no explanation, so they wrote the plot around him having Azdaja to lead into his shadow dragon who, now that we've seen it in part, clearly resembles Azdaja. If the shadow dragon was just going to be a nothing-special second phase gimmick they wouldn't have put it in the art (Golbez is a cool enough design and enough of a hook by himself if all you want is IV nostalgia and 'here's the bad guy'), so the fact that it's in the art means that it's somehow worth teasing and foreshadowing.
But speaking of the art, I can't really get behind SannaR's mention that the body doesn't resemble Azdaja. We just don't see enough of it to be sure on that; the background outside of the dragon, Golbez and the throne is too blurry, so I can't really say 'there should be wings there and there aren't'. All we've really got are the head--which as said, resembles her in the horns and the most curious thing to me is having both eyes--and the hand and part of the body on the other side. The hand's the right shape, the body's the right size, so it's mainly the texture that's wrong there--and I could easily see that being maybe what she looks like without feathers, or in armor, or a void-corruption carapace or something.
Last edited by Cleretic; 04-28-2023 at 02:50 PM.



Are Omega raid bosses a joke to you?I think you're grossly underestimating the writers. They don't just do 'here is the reference, now clap'; they recognize the value of said reference, but they do try to weave it into the world itself so that it matters a bit more than that--and crucially, so that it has any storytelling value at all to the people who haven't played the source game.



I disagree. To me that dragon has zero wings and looks 100% like how dragons in IV look like. The whole chonky segmented scales. It also just looks way too skinny. It looks closer to Ran'jit's dragon then what little we have seen of Azdaja. Not saying that something can't happen to her or she can't be transformed in some way.



Agreed.
I have a very hard time believing that it won't be Azdaja. Our whole reason for visiting the 13th was to rescue her. And, to be honest, it'd be pretty rubbish if it were just some random Dragon he had hidden away all this time - why should we care about that? Defeating a last-minute addition Dragon would be completely inconsequential.
The story has, however, highlighted Azdaja's plight. When you consider that
Golbez has been draining her aether over a long period of time (somewhat evidenced by him giving out small portions of it to the archfiends to gain their service). It isn't difficult to believe that she'd be corrupted if he were help himself to whatever aether she has left, which is probably what he'll do as part of whatever plan he has) and he already demonstrated that he has full control over her even without that.
Being forced to fight her, and the consequences of doing so (particularly for poor Vtra), provides a much more solid story point than Golbez producing some random dragon for us to defeat without any lasting consequence.
Last edited by Carin-Eri; 04-28-2023 at 10:43 PM. Reason: spelling



For a visual reference for how it looks in IV
https://finalfantasy.fandom.com/wiki...Fantasy_IV_2D)
Again I'm not saying it can't be her post transformation of some kind. I'm just saying that the few times we have seen her she doesn't have bulky scales and isn't that skinny. The dragon we do see reminds me of the jointed plastic toy snakes you'd play with back when I was a kid. While being "skinny" like the dragons from BotW/TotK.
And considering how the Golbez fight happens in IV I could see it playing out sort of what Eisi describes.As in IV you beat up Calcabrina, then after a short out of fight chat go into a fight where Golbez summons a Shadow Dragon. Where it incapacitates everyone but Cecil (and Kain if you can time his jump correctly). Just as all seems lost in comes a Mist Dragon that defeats said Shadow Dragon. Oh look it's adult Rydia. Where you then get the fun of trying to get your party back on their feet.
All of that without being able to save or heal up going into the Golbez fight. Not sure if you get a breather in the pixel remaster or not. In the key art the Dragon is showing enough of its body that if it has wings it those probably would be showing a little. Anyone able to post the drawing of all 7 of the 1st Brood? I know it's just an Artist rendition of them but it can help compare and contrast.
Editing this post again just cause I don't want to make a new one to make a new short one that painting is either A: really old, B: done by various artist over time or C: painted by an Ascian cause four of those dragons most people wouldn't have an idea of what they looked like after the 3rd age. Except for Ratatosker who only "recently" wouldn't be available to get a good look at.
Last edited by SannaR; 04-29-2023 at 03:23 AM.



I just think the horns, in particular, are too similar to be a coincidence. If it's not Azdaja or some "shadow" equivalent, I'd be very surprised. I'd chalk up any dissimilarities to either artistic license or some manner of transformation.
And for the record, she looks pretty slender to me in the instance we've seen her so far, especially relative to some of the other major dragons we've seen.



Yeah, I'd guess its Golbez manifesting some creature from the aether he has taken from Azdaja, aka a shadow Azdaja aka essentially a primal. It definitely looks close enough to be based off her to me, if it isn't actually her being mind controlled in the first place. There's really not enough of a difference btwn the art and the in-game model to assume its an entirely different dragon or something.I just think the horns, in particular, are too similar to be a coincidence. If it's not Azdaja or some "shadow" equivalent, I'd be very surprised. I'd chalk up any dissimilarities to either artistic license or some manner of transformation.
And for the record, she looks pretty slender to me in the instance we've seen her so far, especially relative to some of the other major dragons we've seen.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



