Quote Originally Posted by Stormpeaks View Post
The point is that, this constant hunt to try and take stuff away from people because some people think they are owed a house, simply because they play the game, and that it's their "right" to have one, is getting ridiculous.
You know from my other posts that I’m all about adding more features so everyone can participate in housing, and not part of any campaign to take anything away from anyone.

But this statement above… why wouldn’t paying subscribers expect to participate in a game feature? Maybe I’m not fully understanding your meaning here… but yes I think every player should have access to a house. That’s an entirely reasonable expectation. But do you get how it sounds to say “some people think they’re owed a house” referring to people who can’t get one, while defending those who have multiple of a scarce in-game resource?

Don’t get me wrong, I’m still about trying to solve the actual problem: scarcity. Because you’re right, even if all the multi-owners were stripped down to 1 personal/1 FC tomorrow, it isn’t going to fix the overall problem. But statements like that are just fuel for the fire of all those who are understandably upset at not being able to get one house while someone else has like 5. A little empathy goes a long way.