The solution is honestly not as complicated as some think it is

[Stormpeaks]

There is a need for both of those.
People who like decorating cannot do with just one house. They COULD, if instanced housing was a thing, because it would allow for saving and loading interior designs at-will. But as of now owning multiple houses and having multiple characters is the only option. Even if someone were to go for it with just a single house, they would run out of inventory space to store furnishings very quickly.

Now I'm not stating how I feel about this, or what my thoughs are, so please do not take my comment as me saying I'm in favor of people being able to own multiple houses, while others have 0. But it felt necessary to highlight how "The solution is honestly not as complicated as some think it is" is only true, if you decide to ignore or trample on other people to enforce stricter rules. Which IS a possibility - but none I would personally agree with or even recommend.


There is also many reasons for having multiple characters, but I won't go into those to stay on topic.

That's basically it really, it actually isnt as easy as op makes it seem like.

Lets say player A has a few venues, just a random number, 3-4 on their account, 1 house for submarines, 1 personal fc.

You are going to force that player to choose between their venues, their submarines or their personal fc, I'm not sure how that's fair, as I mentioned it earlier in this thread, that rule is fine, but it cant happen for past plot purchases, only in the future, and even then, its a stupid rule in itself, removing houses from multiowners wont all of a sudden give houses to everyone, that's ridiculous, the houses that will free up will be taken in a round or two at most, and then what ? Who do we hunt next ? People that dont decorate their houses ? Should they lose their houses too ? Or maybe those that dont log in daily, maybe if they dont log in a 3 days time limit their house should auto demolish ? Or maybe even people that dont do content, maybe if they dont complete savage they'll lose their houses too ?

The point is that, this constant hunt to try and take stuff away from people because some people think they are owed a house, simply because they play the game, and that it's their "right" to have one, is getting ridiculous.

[Kailea_Nagisa]

That's basically it really, it actually isnt as easy as op makes it seem like.

Lets say player A has a few venues, just a random number, 3-4 on their account, 1 house for submarines, 1 personal fc.

You are going to force that player to choose between their venues, their submarines or their personal fc, I'm not sure how that's fair, as I mentioned it earlier in this thread, that rule is fine, but it cant happen for past plot purchases, only in the future, and even then, its a stupid rule in itself, removing houses from multiowners wont all of a sudden give houses to everyone, that's ridiculous, the houses that will free up will be taken in a round or two at most, and then what ? Who do we hunt next ? People that dont decorate their houses ? Should they lose their houses too ? Or maybe those that dont log in daily, maybe if they dont log in a 3 days time limit their house should auto demolish ? Or maybe even people that dont do content, maybe if they dont complete savage they'll lose their houses too ?

The point is that, this constant hunt to try and take stuff away from people because some people think they are owed a house, simply because they play the game, and that it's their "right" to have one, is getting ridiculous.

That is honestly just being selfish.

[Stormpeaks]

That is honestly just being selfish.

Way to miss the entire point of my post, well done. That's not how reading works, you cant just read what you want and ignore the entire rest of the post.

Yea… ward owners are totally fine yup.
Said nobody ever except the owners themselves.

1 personal and 1 FC is fair, beyond that it’s just nonsense as long as the resource is limited.

Doesn’t matter in the end, just need a better game with actual proper housing (bonus if it’s not tied to a sub). Then poof, gone are those people you disagree with because they dare want 1 good house, I’m not sure SE would appreciate but judging how they treat the matter it’ll be way to late when they do anything at all.

I mean ward owners are fine yes, there is nothing wrong with ward housing, however as was suggested in this forum, they could add bigger apartments in the size of medium and large, with 1 or 2 floors as a solution to the scarcity on extremely high populated worlds.