Just add 1 more step for i635 Relic Weapon with Alternate Effect Color.

[Raoabolic]

No, but it is quite petty to make pointless, and needless remarks such as finger-pointing particular groups of players, e.g., casuals, 'lazy' payers, players wanting everything handed on a plate, 'Limsa AFK folk'.

So yes, people are still petty. Lodging a complaint or criticism towards a piece of content is one thing, attacking or ascribing certain behaviours, agreements, or lack thereof to particular people is something else.

One person's pettiness is another person's critical assessment. The limsa stereotype didn't suddenly pop up one day, it happened for a reason. It's up to you to either defend the status quo and keep that appearance up or see why it's a stereotype and go from there. Though don't feel bad, that stereotype is slowly migrating towards venues, lol.

[Kaurhz]

One person's pettiness is another person's critical assessment. The limsa stereotype didn't suddenly pop up one day, it happened for a reason. It's up to you to either defend the status quo and keep that appearance up or see why it's a stereotype and go from there. Though don't feel bad, that stereotype is slowly migrating towards venues, lol.

I would hardly call this a critical assessment when there are just as many people who are proactive with the game that 'AFK at Limsa' as people so eloquently like to put it. e.g., participating in hunt trains or otherwise. At best it is one person being under a 'hunch' because they cannot handle the simple fact that there are those that prefer this method for varying reasons. There is no 'critical assessment' behind it, just people being petty and equally borderline antagonistic. Again, it's just the simple fact of trying to ascribe certain traits to particular people based on another person's inability to accept the simple fact that someone disagreed with their outlook, and for a genuine reason.

No amount of salad dressing you use will change that fact.