Is it time for yoshi to step down from ff14?

[GTK0HLK]

People really have taken the notion that either the community is the reason why the game still exists..,(false, even if thirdparty additions died, the game would live on, as the original reason would still have people come and support it in gaps..,)

They've also taken the notion, that if something new shows up and it seems to replace what they want despite many logical alternatives as to why it was such, they'll bash it despite the fact its no less than decent.(like said in other threads with so called "Trolls", there is no story reason to have said content, or game reason atm.)

if switching out a person, who not only runs two ROLES, at the same time, who not only is in charge of managing a games development, and also has had blank checks in the past/is part of the board.
is a better option at all?
who would you replace them with, we all know they mess up at times, but people largely value someone who has a potential to listen beforehand(or if you wish to look at it that way, control) vs one who only does so when the company demands it, which is exactly what we would get I'd he was switched out.(we only need to look at other Companies who all had the same boat of Higher ups)

As I've said in many topics..,
We need to Push/Demand on the things that need fixing. Request QoL that improves the systems of the past and today. and Suggest additions that we want, that may not be as imperative or serious, but would overall enhance personal/subjective experiences.

[SannaR]

People really have taken the notion that either the community is the reason why the game still exists..,(false, even if thirdparty additions died, the game would live on, as the original reason would still have people come and support it in gaps..,)

They've also taken the notion, that if something new shows up and it seems to replace what they want despite many logical alternatives as to why it was such, they'll bash it despite the fact its no less than decent.(like said in other threads with so called "Trolls", there is no story reason to have said content, or game reason atm.)

if switching out a person, who not only runs two ROLES, at the same time, who not only is in charge of managing a games development, and also has had blank checks in the past/is part of the board.
is a better option at all?
who would you replace them with, we all know they mess up at times, but people largely value someone who has a potential to listen beforehand(or if you wish to look at it that way, control) vs one who only does so when the company demands it, which is exactly what we would get I'd he was switched out.(we only need to look at other Companies who all had the same boat of Higher ups)

As I've said in many topics..,
We need to Push/Demand on the things that need fixing. Request QoL that improves the systems of the past and today. and Suggest additions that we want, that may not be as imperative or serious, but would overall enhance personal/subjective experiences.

But you can't ask for QoLs cause when we get them people complain that we didn't get content and ask why was this patch or as in Stormblood's case so much in the way of QoL? Only to complain about QoLs being needed for the content we got or they didn't like. All the while the same group asks the question of who the heck asked for this? Or how did this get like this? And all I want to do is groan and let out an exasperated sigh cause a lot act as though some of the changes and new things put into the game or on hold came out of the blue. And that no one asked for any of it.