Inevitable Job Simplifications?

[Renathras]

I'm just remembering you that you forgot how old SMN worked and just kept saying nonsense in comparison with how it actually behaved!

Just stop. You're being intentionally antagonistic. I described how it played BECAUSE I PLAYED IT. It wasn't "reading a guide" (though I DID read guides for it - at the time - BECAUSE I PLAYED IT). You're just being needlessly antagonistic.

And it's you that aren't reading all my posts if you say that. The job is braindead and need more flexibility and things to actually decide during fights, not that fake decision making legos. The execution is terrible but has the tools to be good if changes to the rotation are made and the visual are cool. I already said that, but clearly you just gloss over what want to read and discard the rest. Still have the gall to talk about intellectual laziness...

What did I say in that quote that is wrong?

You think the Job is braindead? That's true.

You dislike the Job? Also true.

You've resisted saying good things about it? Also true. In this thread, what was the last post you said good things about New SMN? Before page 20? Before page 15? Moreover, you make any praise contingent on changes, which isn't praising the extant system.

I've gone back to page 15 so far. I can't find one place you said "It has the tools to be good" and "the visuals are cool", even if we ignore you qualified those with "if it's changed". So even if we count that, you haven't said it in the last 10ish pages of thread. I could probably go back further and also not find it.

I couldn't gloss over what you didn't say.

You're trying desperately for some kind of "gotcha" at this point and failing. Badly.

Maybe you should stop trying to insult me and address actual arguments instead...ad hominem is a logical fallacy for a reason.

.

EDIT: I've gone all the way back to page 1. At no point did you say good things (or even arguably good things) about New SMN as far as I can find.

Maybe you shouldn't lie and make false accusations against people? It would appear my "gall" is well placed.

(As it happens, I read everything I reply to - the entire posts - and am rather Entish about replies. If I'm going to reply to something, I'm going to give it a fully reply as it deserves, and that means I'm also going to read all of it. You MAY accuse me of misunderstanding from time to time, but you can't accuse me of cherry picking from your posts - which you did - and/or ignoring parts:

"gloss over what want to read and discard the rest" is an absolute lie.)