Inevitable Job Simplifications?

[tearagion]

xd

You're insufferable. Just don't respond if you're going to misrepresent, misinterpret, misunderstand, or ignore everything.

[Renathras]

You're insufferable. Just don't respond if you're going to misrepresent, misinterpret, misunderstand, or ignore everything.

THANK YOU!

That's how I've felt since you posted this:

alright this guy has to be taking the piss at this point

This:

lol

And this:

tldr

newSMN is by definition as, or more, disjointed as/than shbSMN and your colossal post doesn't change that.

.

The difference being I'm actually trying to make good faith arguments and debate/discuss while you're routinely belittling either me, my posting style, my points, or some combination of the above. I almost posted in that last post "You're insufferable", too, I just refrained from doing so.

I'm glad you can see HOW ANNOYING IT IS so that MAYBE you'll stop doing it to me. <_<

You've misrepresented, misinterpreted, misunderstood, or ignored me, my points, and my arguments - and even flaunted that you were doing so. You even did it again with "xd". I know you think you're being cute, but it's rather antagonistic. It's why I use "..." instead of "snip", "clip" or etc because those things tend to set people off, so I only use them if someone's been using them several times in a row to me.

UNLIKE you, I'm trying NOT to " misrepresent, misinterpret, misunderstand, or ignore" what you're saying. I'm trying to directly confront the bits I think are mistaken and explain WHY I think they are.

[tearagion]

a

What exactly is "good faith" about completely misrepresenting someone else's argument, intentionally or no? If you're "not trying to-" then you should work on your reading comprehension.

You've misrepresented, misinterpreted, misunderstood, or ignored me, my points, and my arguments

Where? Ignore perhaps, but I feel as though I've clearly understood your inane arguments in general.