The easiest way would be to make both individuals perform atrocities nobody can agree with afterwards. So there was never a case of "one side is less evil", but a case of "both sides are horrible and it was a moment we could not win in no matter what."My guess is this alleged 'choice' will be a Sophie's Choice situation--something like us having to make a decision about who to help, neither option is 'the good one' but there's no way to save both, and we just have to live with the decision we make. Whether or not said 'choice' is actually a branching thing we're asked to decide about, or our hand is circumstantially forced down one path, I don't know; they're capable of doing both well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.