Wait a sec... Let me get this straight...

[Aceofspades]

Why are plds always such crybabies when there's another tank alternative? When every there's another tank you can be sure Paladins will be crying for them to be nerfed. Even in FF11. "Oh Noes ppl r inviting Ninjas! It take more than 5 mins to get a prty invite now.

excuse me while I LOL @ this. Back before they made changes to WAR, those who actually tanked on PLD, most were advocating that PLD didnt need changes to be a viable tank, and certainly did better job against single target fights, or at least I did. It was the constant crying from the WAR TANKS! whom were complaining about how useless pld was and how op war was to pld that , if anything, could be used as a contributer to the changes. However, that being said, Upon changes SE did say that the dps output and enmity gain on war being soo strong , was an UNINTENDED result. SE basicly just gave war massive aoe DD along with super strong hate abilities soo that they covered both tank and dd bases, what they failed to do before they released the job was put a govenor between the two soo that WAR couldnt do both masive dd AND tank. It wasnt a gimp, it was a adjustment to allow WARs to decide a general direction, tank or dd, not both as that would obviously be OP in any situation. Example, Imagine if BLM had the same damage mitigation as PLD, why would anyone bring a PLD, same effect when war had no govenor between dps set up and tank set up.