Rebalance for MCH, please...

[RajNish]

Who fucking cares? It's not a game designed for 1v1. If you're approaching it from a 1v1 standpoint, no fucking wonder you suck at it.

Yeah, when I'm "suck at it".

[Gserpent]

Yeah, when I'm "suck at it".

Congratulations on winning a casual game.

[RajNish]

Congratulations on winning a casual game.

Casual or not, your skill set is no different. You have the choice to keep complaining about the MCH not being good enough or to use the whole set. However, everything is clear with you.

[Gserpent]

Casual or not, your skill set is no different. You have the choice to keep complaining about the MCH not being good enough or to use the whole set. However, everything is clear with you.

You're not doing a good job being an ambassador for whatever it is you're trying to prove. You posted a screenshot of a game where the enemy team pretty much ignored you and are trying to use that as something to counteract another person whining about MNK dunking him when he plays MCH.

Like, ???

[Reinhardt_Azureheim]

Yeah, when I'm "suck at it".

Your ability to perform well and showcasing it with a single screenshot of you doing well does not indicate you being a good player, only that you did well in that one match. It has minimal bearing what actually happened in the match. The most I can tell from it is that you either have rarely been focused or played at extremely long ranges and disengaged / LOSed frequently while popping out of cover a lot for damage. However the general skill level of the match is weird if you take a look at your monk for example who only got about 300,000 dmg in the match and had to sit on the Crystal for extended periods of time.

While the choice of words from Gserpent isn't quite noble, he has a point - Machinist isn't great at 1v1s VS jobs actually capable of picking 1v1 fights efficiently, so it isn't surprising when a Machinist will suffer against reasonably skilled players in a 1v1. This is why looking at Machinist balance in the context of 1v1 is somewhat futile.

[RajNish]

Your ability to perform well and showcasing it with a single screenshot of you doing well does not indicate you being a good player, only that you did well in that one match. It has minimal bearing what actually happened in the match. The most I can tell from it is that you either have rarely been focused or played at extremely long ranges and disengaged / LOSed frequently while popping out of cover a lot for damage. However the general skill level of the match is weird if you take a look at your monk for example who only got about 300,000 dmg in the match and had to sit on the Crystal for extended periods of time.

While the choice of words from Gserpent isn't quite noble, he has a point - Machinist isn't great at 1v1s VS jobs actually capable of picking 1v1 fights efficiently, so it isn't surprising when a Machinist will suffer against reasonably skilled players in a 1v1. This is why looking at Machinist balance in the context of 1v1 is somewhat futile.

Please re-read what I wrote before. I said that the MCH can not only quickly escape but also kill one on one in some cases. To be honest, I don’t care what Gserpent player is, good or bad, or his point of wiev, because he definitely needs to improve his attentive reading skill. And by the way, you too. Because the main idea was not about one on one, but about the use of the entire set of skills. Will you argue with this? Good luck!

[Reinhardt_Azureheim]

Ok Jesus this is a lot to sort out...

Please re-read what I wrote before. I said that the MCH can not only quickly escape but also kill one on one in some cases. To be honest, I don’t care what Gserpent player is, good or bad, or his point of view, because he definitely needs to improve his attentive reading skill. And by the way, you too. Because the main idea was not about one on one, but about the use of the entire set of skills. Will you argue with this? Good luck!

For starters - my main message to you was about the screenshot you posted when you felt the need to react to Gserpent talking to Valence, this is the conversation history:

Good luck killing a melee one on one as a MCH... Unless they're out of resources and you're not I guess. Or if they don't know what they're doing.

Who fucking cares? It's not a game designed for 1v1. If you're approaching it from a 1v1 standpoint, no fucking wonder you suck at it.

Yeah, when I'm "suck at it". <scoreboard screenshot>

Your ability to perform well and showcasing it with a single screenshot of you doing well does not indicate you being a good player, only that you did well in that one match. It has minimal bearing what actually happened in the match. The most I can tell from it is that you either have rarely been focused or played at extremely long ranges and disengaged / LOSed frequently while popping out of cover a lot for damage. However the general skill level of the match is weird if you take a look at your monk for example who only got about 300,000 dmg in the match and had to sit on the Crystal for extended periods of time.

<bottom message not intended for you>

You are 100% correct - nobody assumed that it was you who primarily spoke of 1v1 scenarios, you only mentioned that it can hold its' own for a while in some cases.

While the choice of words from Gserpent isn't quite noble, he has a point - Machinist isn't great at 1v1s VS jobs actually capable of picking 1v1 fights efficiently, so it isn't surprising when a Machinist will suffer against reasonably skilled players in a 1v1. This is why looking at Machinist balance in the context of 1v1 is somewhat futile.

This part of my message was not directed at you - it was a general statement for anyone arguing in favour of or against 1v1ing as a Machinist. I only meant to flesh out the meaning that bothering about 1v1 talks for Machinist balance is a futile endeavour.

However, as the conversation goes and Valence approaches Gserpent that there may have been a misunderstanding (albeit a heated one with Gserpent's usual temper) and that Valence didn't intend his message to be viewed this way, you step forward and are like:

[1] I think he meant my message. But I also never said anywhere that MCH should fight 1v1 or that I consider team combat as a one-on-one fight. This is nonsense. All I said was that this class is capable of knocking out a melee when dangerously close, or at least forcing them to flee. My message was mainly that the MCH has decent damage, ability to kite and even at close range this class is able to successfully fend off a melee, unless you are focused by a whole group or a couple of melee.

You once again are somehow under the impression that Gserpent's and mine responses about MCH 1v1ing were meant for you when it was absolutely not. You never once talked about it in the thread, yet you continue to think we meant you somehow.

[2] The log I showed is far from the best, but it was taken as an example of the melee just not reaching me, besides that it was Cloud Nine, where the MCH can work very efficiently.

It's very strange for me to see people prejudice a screenshot without knowing the situation and not being there, using it to moking. Because I never said anywhere that I was the best MCH in Eorzea. I just wanted to say "use your arsenal properly, all your arsenal".

I feel sorry for you if you felt prejudiced on by some of us here, however I hope it didn't go the wrong way when I said that it is difficult to judge what your screenshot is trying to show. What some of the others posted was definitely out of line, no doubt.

But I don't think your message came across the way you intended when you posted the screenshot, given the aforementioned conversation history between the four of us. Had you posted a few things extra, things may have looked different.

Anyhow, one last thing:

[...]because he definitely needs to improve his attentive reading skill. And by the way, you too. Because the main idea was not about one on one, but about the use of the entire set of skills. Will you argue with this? Good luck!

While I will make no efforts about Gserpent here, I believe you owe me a small apology at least.

You jam yourself into an argument you weren't part of, somehow start believing not one but two people said something that you clearly didn't say and neither of us intended for you, yet somehow I am the one who needs to improve his attentive reading skill? Seriously? That Ad Hominem was extremely unwarranted.

[RajNish]

While I will make no efforts about Gserpent here, I believe you owe me a small apology at least.

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. My sincere apologies. It's just that Gserpent has his temper, and I have mine. And thanks for taking the time. I hope I didn't upset you too much. <3

[Reinhardt_Azureheim]

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. My sincere apologies. It's just that Gserpent has his temper, and I have mine. And thanks for taking the time. I hope I didn't upset you too much. <3

All is well, as long as the misunderstandings have been cleared up I won't dwell on it any longer. Also sorry in retrospect if anything in the post sounded a bit harsh.

[Elfidan]

Sounds like something somebody that has never played a ranged in CC would say.

Literally S2 crystal BRD and avid MCH Enjoyer.

( there is definitely a middle ground for sure, but sitting on your ass on the crystal while you're getting pummeled by AoEs and melees specifically only waiting for your squishy self to get in range sounds really like something somebody that has no real clue what they're talking about would say... so please tell me that's not what you meant with that post.

Did you read it? because 12 seconds of crystal for any role is laughable. Also the tone of the post is questioning how the scorecard nods to any meaningful gameplay when the analyzed stats suggest max range play and little support.

As one of the squishiest classes in pvp, you're not supposed to eat as much damage as melees or healers, plain and simple, else you're just griefing.

Squishiest? Do you not understand how your turret works?

If you have to get on point to contest the crystal, it's for specific cases, like you team losing, overtime, or trying to offset the amount of enemies over it because they're mega committing )

Nobody is arguing that. The question is in what game do you have 3 melee on your team and 12 seconds on crystal time? Stats point to the whm picking up the slack for a pretend sniper.

TLDR: Just another day of Look at my cherry picked SS followed by devil's advocate 'I bet you don't even play (Role/job/game mode here)!'