SE need to stop this!

[Edelgarde]

Oh just make a shell FC yourself, and piss off the guy by taking a plot there. Hehehe. Have your FC tag as 'SUKIT'

[Shibi]

Oh just make a shell FC yourself, and piss off the guy by taking a plot there. Hehehe.

A chance at Combo-blocking their last 6 is a worthy prize.

The winning FC could maybe even be sold to them for quite a few gilcaps down the track.

[Hanayumi]

More or less why I think there should be rent costs, if not straight up gil then a very very hefty chunks of FC credits could work as well...

[Curisu]

More or less why I think there should be rent costs, if not straight up gil then a very very hefty chunks of FC credits could work as well...

That would be a great Idea.
These company points that any somewhat active FC has million's from.

These shell FC would probably start to use bots for leveling and dungeon clears, but that would add a additional risk for them.

Also, make that FCs can only buy them for these company points.
So you will have big and active FCs in the big and expensive house's, instead of a rich single player.

[Themarvin]

Spot on... 1milion per month for a large plot 750k for a medium and 250k for a small one per month counting as tax fees, as for those that own and run within the limit it is no biggie, but if having a full ward... then it is suddenly quite the millions needed in upkeep per month.

I can only agree to this suggestion.

[RobynDaBank]

Spot on... 1milion per month for a large plot 750k for a medium and 250k for a small one per month counting as tax fees, as for those that own and run within the limit it is no biggie, but if having a full ward... then it is suddenly quite the millions needed in upkeep per month.

I can only agree to this suggestion.

If that person can afford to buy up the whole ward... they can afford that rent. You're only screwing over people who take their time to put together money and make buying a house an end-goal.

[Avoidy]

If that person can afford to buy up the whole ward... they can afford that rent. You're only screwing over people who take their time to put together money and make buying a house an end-goal.

Just came in to say this. These dudes who gobble up entire wards usually have submarine empires running in the background just generating them loads of passive gil ever week or whatever.
The solution this whole time involves scrapping this trash ward system, but since it's Square's baby, all we can do is hope they keep adding more wards.

BIG THANKS FOR THE OUTDOOR-ONLY FURNITURE ITEM in the xmas event btw, thank you for once again sticking it to people who don't have front yards for this crap.

[Troxbark]

Spot on... 1milion per month for a large plot 750k for a medium and 250k for a small one per month counting as tax fees, as for those that own and run within the limit it is no biggie, but if having a full ward... then it is suddenly quite the millions needed in upkeep per month.

I can only agree to this suggestion.

And it wouldn't out a single dent into the wealth those players have, plus it only hurts smaller fc. It also runs to risk of these people using bots to generate more gil


They need to actually enforce the rules and imo have fc member activity requirements.

[Raven2014]

Spot on... 1milion per month for a large plot 750k for a medium and 250k for a small one per month counting as tax fees, as for those that own and run within the limit it is no biggie, but if having a full ward... then it is suddenly quite the millions needed in upkeep per month.

No, just ... no.

These people already have so much money that even if you triple the suggested amount it wouldn't put a dent on their wallet. Also you probably doesn't own a house and dont know, but once fully set up (can take about a month) the house itself will make more than 1mil per "week". Your suggestion is a great way if the goal is to make sure no casual players will even be able to afford it, giving the rich players even more exclusive access.

This is like when someone think a casual policy targeting the rich will solve the problem. But reality is the rich will have enough resource to shrug it off or even get around it altogether, so it's the poorer people that the policy supposed to protect is the one getting hammed.