I'll get to the irony part when I reply to Oizen below.
I've got 4 characters on Marilith. One is on the back burner for the moment (it's the character I created on Marilith for the gil bonus). One is on 4.0 MSQ - just finished Doma Castle (queued for it on Marilith, almost instant queue). One is on 6.0 MSQ - just did The Dark Inside. Again, queued for it on Marilith and that was a 6 minute queue but trial queues take longer so only 6 minutes was a nice surprise. The last is my Marilith main that just needs to get 6.2 MSQ done but I keep putting it off while working on house decorating and playing the other characters. I'll be honest - I'm expecting the queue for Storm's Crown to be a pain in the butt since it's the most recent trial and most Dynamis players are working on leveling alts through earlier parts of the MSQ. I might end up going to another data center to get it done.
I go out into the world and I see players. Not as many as I would on Crystal but I'm still seeing other players. Whether it's hunts or tribal quests or gathering, there are other players out there on the Dynamis worlds. Again, not as many as on other NA worlds but still enough that I can say without hesitation that Dynamis is not dead.
What criteria are you using to come to the conclusion that Dynamis is dead? Sitting alone in your house staring at PF?
Same question to you. What criteria are you using to say that Dynamis is dead?
Seems like just about everyone in this thread is using PF as proof that Dynamis is dead. Is that not why you're traveling to other data centers, so you can use PF there?
Do you genuinely not see the irony in your statement when you are traveling elsewhere to find people to fill spots in group for the content you want to do while not being interested in filling spots in groups for other players trying to get the content they want to do done? That's all PF is - a way to find people to fill groups just as Duty Finder is.
If you don't care about the population on Dynamis and you've been using data center travel since it was first implemented, why are you complaining?