Why does Square-Enix not sell subs for gil?

[Ayche]

This thread is the rare for the forums, an actual "Pro-RMT" post.

[RobynDaBank]

I think if SQEX banned Gil buyers they would state so in their monthly/weekly RMT bans. alongside advertisers and bots.

[Deceptus]

I think selling the subs would be a bad idea, however, I do think they should allow other items on the market to be sold for gil. Mounts, emotes, outfit pieces, furnishings..all fair game.

Triple Triad cards. . .

[Velvet_Lunarfang]

I highly doubt they would do it because SE has had issues with disastrous game launches and developments lately, losing quite a lot of money. FFXIV is carrying SE and making most of their revenues currently.
https://twitter.com/aitaikimochi/sta...35968344051712

Well hopefully FFXIV will be bought by someone else who can give them a bigger budget then SE can give. SE has been dying out for a while now and the proof shows with selling off IP's. One game cannot keep a company afloat

[FireMage]

This thread is the rare for the forums, an actual "Pro-RMT" post.

Well yeah, it's a troll that started the thread, what did you expect?

[Neoyoshi]

The section of 5chan i never knew existed.

[Dyvid]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHzsRPmCaIE&t=695s

Bottomline is RMT is bad; regardless if it's from owning the company or some shady 3rd party vendor.

[IkaraGreydancer]

Well hopefully FFXIV will be bought by someone else who can give them a bigger budget then SE can give. SE has been dying out for a while now and the proof shows with selling off IP's. One game cannot keep a company afloat

For a dying company they sure are putting out quite a bit in 2023. Also a new company helming XIV doesn't automatically mean the game will be so much better. Tera and Vindictus comes to mind

[Katt_Felista]

No, no, no and no.