Results -9 to 0 of 496

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Alleo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    4,730
    Character
    Light Khah
    World
    Moogle
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 91
    Quote Originally Posted by AwesomeJr44 View Post
    I'm referring to stuff like this. It has nothing to do with whether or not you like or dislike Endwalker. A good portion of my friends like Endwalker and I have no problem with them because they're not disingenuous and don't say/do things like calling people Russian sympathizers if they like Garlemald. I've sadly had the displeasure of interacting with the people I've listed and each has earned my distaste for them by being intellectually dishonest.
    Where were you when he called me offputting by simply liking how cute the new beast tribe is? Or when he said that people that liked Endwalker never knew loss or are handling it wrong? Why is it that Kazemons post is so bad, yet he can bascially insult everyone who disagrees with him, including saying something about their personal grief. What about being called a four year old just because one enjoys the questline of a beast tribe?

    But I guess we who like Endwalker deserve this while anyone who doesnt like it, is a victim.

    Dont complain about people slinging mud when you guys are bascially having a mud war against others the whole time...

    Quote Originally Posted by Kozh View Post
    It's normal for people to have OC/name that they're attached to. I have one that I made during middle school because I misheard a planet/star name, and fun fact, I still use it for my ffxiv username and one of my alts (used to). Not everything has to be self-insert. Don't be weird.
    The self insert was about the character not him as a person...he bascially has a alt character who is a dark blonde elezen with that name which he then uses for the main NPC in Garlemald. It feels to me like he self inserted his own playable character (not himself...) into the rewrite of the story.

    Edit:

    In the end I dont understand why Endwalker is so horrible. Aveyond wants to have destruction, death and seemingly no real happy ending.
    Well if you like the opposing factions like Garlemald or the Ascians, isnt that what you got? Garlemald got their whole city destroyed, with a huge amount of the people death. We did not get a happy ending for the Ascians or the Ancients either. Instead of being able to change their fates, it happened again. All of the "heros" on that side are death.

    I mean that seems to be a perfect ending for a very grim dark story? The only thing missing is the WoL being able to join that faction like you do in WoW. If you could this would have bascially be a expanion full of huge losses.

    But I guess it comes down to not wanting happy ends for those characters you dont like, while wanting one for those you do. Not very dark imo. I will never understand how one can be so angry about the scions surviving while also saying that we should have created a split timeline where the Ancients survive. That would mean that one person was able to change the bad outcome for millions of lifeforms. I would have nothing against such a story plot. But I also love happy endings.

    Anyway I am looking forward to the last quest of the beast tribe and what they will do with the unsolved plot point. I really hope we get another section of Elysium in the style of the missing ones.
    (19)
    Last edited by Alleo; 11-04-2022 at 11:34 PM.