The Problem with Healer Feedback, and requested changes

[Shurrikhan]

Who is arguing to truncate? I'm arguing to expand 3 healers and leave one alone. Leaving a thing alone is not truncating it.

So, you've got 4 starving people...

The apparent general consensus so far: Let them eat as much as they need to reach healthy levels.

You: No! Keep one starved! It's not that I'm denying any of that one food, though; I'm just only feeding 3. After all, the last might want to be hungry but wouldn't be able to resist eating if there were food around!

Yes, frames of reference will matter. If most else would rather healer kits each feel fuller and more engaging, and the discourse is forming around that, but you alone specifically asking that one healer's kit not be thus improved (be left as is)... there is then no difference between "leaving (a bad state) as is" and "truncating" possible improvements. We were already discussing the improvements we'd like to see before you're "axe that; keep them the same." Nor is there any difference between saying that all but one job should have its damage-dealing left as is and truncating what's available for those other jobs.