That Which He Does Not Play

[Raoabolic]

Claiming Zealotry over this is pretty hyperbolic there, bud.

Care to prove me wrong? lol

[Kaurhz]

Care to prove me wrong? lol

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. You come with wild claims, be prepared to back them up and defend them

If your baseline for zealotry is a thread such as this with a discussion then I stand by my point of it being hyperbole.

[Raoabolic]

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. You come with wild claims, be prepared to back them up and defend them

If your baseline for zealotry is a thread such as this with a discussion then I stand by my point of it being hyperbole.

Well, one says you are blindly defending faults. You say there are no faults. Go on, explain. lol

[Kaurhz]

Well, one says you are blindly defending faults. You say there are no faults. Go on, explain. lol

Faults in the case of the context of this particular thread are not universal and objective tastes. This would similarly remain throughout the story. Now, if your measure of faults would be pertaining to something such as handling certain races in the game, or certain decisions. E.g., For expanding a system that is inherently flawed then I would be inclined to concede to a point with you. However, this particular thread is not the case and neither was the discussion itself. Unless, of course, you are laying claim to have read all 1639 of my posts?

Me disagreeing with someone on what would or wouldn't be a fault, particularly when it is of a subjective nature is not zealotry, but keep trying bud, I'm not obligated to agree with you on everything regardless of how you want to dress your terms on other people. All you're doing is being obtrude by treating your perspective of 'faults' as being the only objective truth.