That Which He Does Not Play

[Theodric]

Me and my ilk, no I'm just an individual expressing my own opinions as and when I see fit throughout any thread I see fit, but if you wish. Sounds like you're speaking both out of your depth and with a warped perception of reality if this is your outlook, but whatever makes you sleep at night, I guess.

I get it though coming up with these narratives and trying to poison the well is sort of your thing. Fortunately, people are becoming wise to this tactic of yours.

You're free to draw whatever conclusions you so wish. There's certainly no shortage of forum posters who, especially in response to any criticism of Endwalker, decide to come up with all sorts of wild theories about posters who simply come here to discuss the game and leave feedback.

Which is precisely what I was referring to in regards to 'ilk'.

Either way, if you're unwilling to agree to disagree then I have no further reason to engage with you.

[Raoabolic]

You're free to draw whatever conclusions you so wish. There's certainly no shortage of forum posters who, especially in response to any criticism of Endwalker, decide to come up with all sorts of wild theories about posters who simply come here to discuss the game and leave feedback.

Which is precisely what I was referring to in regards to 'ilk'.

Either way, if you're unwilling to agree to disagree then I have no further reason to engage with you.

To be fair, what outcome did you expect trying to reason with zealots?
We allow this to happen in the public forum even when it comes to issues that affect many others. Of course it would happen in just about any entertainment forum, lol.

[hagare]

To be fair, what outcome did you expect trying to reason with zealots?
We allow this to happen in the public forum even when it comes to issues that affect many others. Of course it would happen in just about any entertainment forum, lol.

ah you mean the aveyond defense force.
Are your rations burgers? xD

[Kaurhz]

You're free to draw whatever conclusions you so wish. There's certainly no shortage of forum posters who, especially in response to any criticism of Endwalker, decide to come up with all sorts of wild theories about posters who simply come here to discuss the game and leave feedback.

Which is precisely what I was referring to in regards to 'ilk'.

Either way, if you're unwilling to agree to disagree then I have no further reason to engage with you.

I would say I have been pretty neutral with respect to my stance on the game and what I view as its flaws. You seem to be under the impression that all individuals are going to have the self-same criticism and are thus universal across the community. But I hardly think you should be the one to come up with the point regarding wild theories considering your assessment of myself thus far based on the sum of what is arguably a very limited amount of encounters with yourself.

This is precisely what I was referring to when discussing you being out of your depth and coming in with some warped perception about other posters. You know, coming up with all sorts of wild theories about other posters who simply come here to have a discussion. But alas, I see you cannot go even a couple of posts without exhibiting some form of hypocrisy, which you have equally just called out another poster for.

To be fair, what outcome did you expect trying to reason with zealots?
We allow this to happen in the public forum even when it comes to issues that affect many others. Of course it would happen in just about any entertainment forum, lol.

Claiming Zealotry over this is pretty hyperbolic there, bud.

[Raoabolic]

Claiming Zealotry over this is pretty hyperbolic there, bud.

Care to prove me wrong? lol

[Kaurhz]

Care to prove me wrong? lol

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. You come with wild claims, be prepared to back them up and defend them

If your baseline for zealotry is a thread such as this with a discussion then I stand by my point of it being hyperbole.

[Raoabolic]

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. You come with wild claims, be prepared to back them up and defend them

If your baseline for zealotry is a thread such as this with a discussion then I stand by my point of it being hyperbole.

Well, one says you are blindly defending faults. You say there are no faults. Go on, explain. lol

[Kaurhz]

Well, one says you are blindly defending faults. You say there are no faults. Go on, explain. lol

Faults in the case of the context of this particular thread are not universal and objective tastes. This would similarly remain throughout the story. Now, if your measure of faults would be pertaining to something such as handling certain races in the game, or certain decisions. E.g., For expanding a system that is inherently flawed then I would be inclined to concede to a point with you. However, this particular thread is not the case and neither was the discussion itself. Unless, of course, you are laying claim to have read all 1639 of my posts?

Me disagreeing with someone on what would or wouldn't be a fault, particularly when it is of a subjective nature is not zealotry, but keep trying bud, I'm not obligated to agree with you on everything regardless of how you want to dress your terms on other people. All you're doing is being obtrude by treating your perspective of 'faults' as being the only objective truth.