Quote Originally Posted by FireMage View Post
And was also cited by its own writers as not gospel. So anything of value to reply with or....?
I've replied with far more of value than you and your rather petty griping "well it could be wrong, so I won't accept it". As I said, it does not need to be "gospel" for them to draw upon this source later should they want to justify the presence of a Garlean MC. And that is all that matters.

All I see in your posts is exceedingly motivated "reasoning".