What Zero Could've Been

[Midareyukki]

I point you to the most obvious dynamic: Thancred & Ryne.

People DO like that dynamic when it's done well. Ryne was - quite literally - a useless reincarnation magical girl who didn't do anything in the beginning but just kind of sit there and watch. Thancred protects her as he did Minfilia, and at the same time, taught her to be her own person. She does eventually become her own person who makes her own choices. That dynamic is completely fine actually and even at the time -- the story makes sense as to why it goes that route. In the end, it doesn't look like she continues fighting or anything like that. She and Gaia help out in the Crystarium and eat some coffee biscuits together. While she fought, she settled down in the end and just does her best to look after her friends. That seems still strong for me - she chose to live that way and she's found some peace.

Same with the RDM quest line. Anya and X'hrun (I'm probably spelling his name wrong, but ya get what I mean lol) also have that dynamic. You and the old cat protect Anya the whole way through until she learns to fend for herself. She gets over her fears and becomes stronk. Things like that.

I think most of the contention here, at least in this thread, is aveyond's tone really, really borderlines incel/niceguy levels lol. There's nothing wrong with requesting more "strong guy/weak girl" dynamics, really. What is wrong is saying that many women in the story except for Yotsuyu apparently is written bad because they act a little mean towards guys. And yeah honestly just take a look at his other threads about this.

Aveyond wants that look for most of the characters though. They have repeatedly said that's how they'd like most of the cast to look and behave. Just go take a look at their OP about how'd they change most of the cast. They also tend to disagree with anything that remotely falls short of said look and personality. Course I won't be surprised if they or someone else goes nuh-uh that's not what they mean despite what descriptors they continue to use to paint the type of men and women they want to see. And the kind if behavior they want from them.

Alright I understand what's going on better now. Thank you. And yeah, like... trying to be so forceful about this topic and pushing it on every character is daft. When I was asking, I did think of Thancred and Ryne. Shadowbringers was drawing heavily from FF8, and that's written in the same tone as the Medieval Romance literature. Same for Ryne and Gaia; not that they're "in love" with eachother necessarily, but that their dynamic is based heavily on Medieval Romance, where you have a "knight" who wants to protect his "loved one" and would give his life for her, even if it's unattainable and all that jazz (basically, imagine Lancelot, it's literally that). I did not think of RDM's characters, but good shout.

And as problematic as some stories from that genre are, I personally think it's a pretty sweet/cute relationship, it just can't be the only thing you present to people. Not just because it looks like you're pushing an agenda, it also becomes stale wicked fast.

My reaction was really mostly because people brought up how it led to mysoginy, but I see now that the issue isn't the dynamic itself, but rather Aveyond's insistence on it which disregards everything that doesn't fit into that mold.

There is nothing against that but in case you haven’t noticed he complains about every character ever made, like dude at this point make your own game or shut up.

And my problem with it personally is that I am sick and tired of the little blond girl being saved by the burly man as much as I am tired of the super strong independent woman who doesn’t need a man.
It goes both ways. It’s beyond boring and we have enough of both narratives going around in movies and games.

He is constantly reducing women to having to be nice to male characters, emotional and in love like ok?…..Much personality?

I'm really used to people having really extreme opinions on some characters. So I never really thought much about it. I am aware that he does complain a lot about how the game is done, and I don't agree with frankly most of it. There are some stuff that I pick up here and there, but mostly out of discussion, not really because I instantly agree and subscribe to it. For example, I do have issues with, say, G'raha or Y'shtola, but I don't want them gone nor do I want their fundamental character so altered just to fit my own view. If anything, I want to see more of them that isn't the same facet, which Y'shtola has shown really well and G'raha has with his Exarch side.

Same with Zero. I loved how Zero was introduced and I can't wait to see who she is and what she will do. Especially after people pointed out it could lead to "Zero"mus.

And yeah, as I said. It's reducing every dynamic to that sort of thing that's a problem, because it quickly makes people question where it is you stand.