What Zero Could've Been

[AwesomeJr44]

....there are no words to describe what I think of this statement. A traitor, a murderer, a psychopathic homicidal woman who delights in torture..what the hell IS this?.

Vel.

Please.

Edit.

Your.

Posts.

So.

The.

Thread.

Doesn't.

Look.

Like.

This.

Also.

Try.

To.

Include.

Who.

You.

Are.

Responding.

To.

As.

It.

Looks.

Like.

You're.

Shouting.

Into.

the.

Void.

Gottem.

[SentioftheHoukai]

....there are no words to describe what I think of this statement. A traitor, a murderer, a psychopathic homicidal woman who delights in torture..what the hell IS this?.

Well, personally I'd say it's this:



Ironic similarity between Venat/Hydaelyn and Yotsuyu/Tsuyu, they both have legions of stans ready and willing to defend their every atrocity by citing what they suffered in their tragic backstories taking place in some distant past with their victims lying solely in the present and having precious little to do with what they suffered.

Its stalkerish to reply to somebody on an open and public forum?
Well shoot, I guess everyone is a stalker

When Puksi labeled me his stalker because I responded to him twice in my entire career on these forums on the Voidsent thread he got 13 updoots. Kindly piss off with your double standards. You didn't care then, why now? Oh right, because I'm an acceptable target who doesn't share your views. Never you mind how Vel responds to nearly every post Aveyond makes and is always hostile.

Proof:

Do I know you? Because this is the second thread you've come from nowhere and tried to pick a fight with me.

I'm morbidly curious how you think an unborn child wasn't an innocent victim, but you do you, whoever you are. ʅ(ツ)ʃ

Edit: From 2019? That's...not creepy or anything.

The oddity here is someone has apparently been stalking me for three years.

And since you're trying to take the OP off-topic, I will place lore discussion under a snip.

Why Vauthry? Why not Vauthry? Seriously, looking at your signature alone, this is the character you choose to clutch your pearls over?

He was corrupted before birth and groomed to a very specific task.



a.k.a, to be a stopgap to keep the Light from overtaking the First before the Rejoining could happen. There's no reason to believe that Valens van Var--er, Emet-Selch would corrupt this infant, only to then say eh, grow up to do what you want, go fight those Sin Eaters. Instead, the child was brainwashed to believe he was the protagonist of the story, and anyone who came against him were "villains" who must be stopped. A lot of people love waxing on how terrible it was for their WoL to come this close to losing themselves to Lightwarden corruption. How is it any less terrible for a child who had no blessing of Hydaelyn, and was being fed lies to make sure they performed their part in the Ascians' plan?

Cylva confirms the Ascians were not passive players in Eulmore. It was the Ascians' idea to raise The Virtues, and it was the Ascians who left Gaia an orphan alone in the city.

The Virtues, who behaved in a way that completely twisted how they were in life, as Titania went from a beloved ruler to being kept in the cramped old castle. As Tesleen tried to kill us, as we would have killed our friends had we not contained the Light. Light corruption has never left the victim unscathed, but for some reason, you expect it of this character, since birth. Why?

To his dying breath, he didn't understand that he was not the hero he was groomed to believe he was. But he needed to be convinced he was doing good, twisted though it was, when he had the power to not care at all.

Even the Exarch said Vauthry's hope was "to vindicate his existence". Yoshida asked players to consider was Vauthry really a friend of the Sin Eaters, or was he controlled by someone.

Vauthry was a tragic character, and considering they had to convince him he was the good guy, he probably would have been a much better ruler than his father, if the Ascians hadn't corrupted him. But Emet-Selch never gave him a choice to be anything other than what he was created to do.

Now, I'm going to ask you to please stop stalking my posts. I don't even recall engaging you before, and I'm sure you've got better things to do.

[Boblawblah]

So badass. Love Venat.

[AwesomeJr44]

So badass. Love Venat.

Yeah, she's great. Really fits the psychopathic murderer villain archetype well. She'd make the Joker from the Dark Knight proud. Maybe they could team up in a crossover game?

[SentioftheHoukai]

So badass. Love Venat.

Thanks so much for proving my point. If the dreaded and faithful Fora Knights of Lady Hydaelyn didn't possess double standards, they'd yet have naught at all. And so, do they cling evermore onto the fallacious.

[Boblawblah]

Thanks so much for proving my point. If the dreaded and faithful Fora Knights of Lady Hydaelyn didn't possess double standards, they'd yet have naught at all. And so, do they cling evermore onto the fallacious.

What was your point?

[Zanarkand-Ronso]

When Puksi labeled me his stalker because I responded to him twice in my entire career on these forums on the Voidsent thread he got 13 updoots. Kindly piss off with your double standards. You didn't care then, why now? Oh right, because I'm an acceptable target who doesn't share your views. Never you mind how Vel responds to nearly every post Aveyond makes and is always hostile.

.....why...and HOW would I care about a conversation I never saw? (till now)
I never visited or was apart of that thread. Do my "Double Standards" suddenly disappear if I care Now after you told me about it?
And what does that have to do with me? Are you under some weird impression Im one of those upvotes? Man, get outta here with that XD

[VelKallor]

You really do come off some sort of weird, obsessed stalker of Aveyond, Vel

This is a public forum, he made the post and thread publically, regardless of WHO it is, that kind of take is beyond ridiculous.

Also, you shouldn't double (triple!) post like that, it generally tends to be violations (albeit minor ones) of most forum's ToS.

Thanks for the advisory by the way, I will try and not make that kind of una-void-able mistake again.

[Zanarkand-Ronso]

I like women with snarky/fun personalities. Within reason of course, constant snark gets old, but Y'shtola isn't constantly snarky.
Fordola is also an interesting character once she grows up a bit.

I'll cosign this, and agree Yshtola hasnt hit THAT mark yet.
And I love Fordola, I hope she takes on a bigger role. Maybe not as a Traveling Companion, but Id love her around more, even as a Temp Party Member and a Trust.

[RukoBoshi]

And of course the subject got derailed in the same endless debate.
Not even a single mention of Zero is this page. Does it not get tiring to shout the same things over and over again ?
I already know the answer but still.