Is it possible to create a 100% male guild ?

[Kes13a]

I am fairly certain, especially if they were in fact "banned" for creating their FC of all males, that there was something insulting or derogative in its name or recruiting methods. as usual when a "victim" spouts off about their "ban" in game, I doubt we know the whole true story but only the OP's cherrypicked.. uh..."facts"

I mean really, they have 100% lala FC's, if thats allowed, then whats wrong with all male?
definitely bait with a side of slightly insulting as per their standard style.

[Serilda]

I am fairly certain, especially if they were in fact "banned" for creating their FC of all males, that there was something insulting or derogative in its name or recruiting methods. as usual when a "victim" spouts off about their "ban" in game, I doubt we know the whole true story but only the OP's cherrypicked.. uh..."facts"

Given that, twice in the space of three short posts in this thread (including the OP), they managed to casually dismiss women as inferior beings when it comes to both gaming and (ironically) online debate, I do not have much faith that their recruitment drives for their FC were any less derogatory. Their nasty prejudices are signposted for everyone to see in everything they write.

[UkcsAlias]

I mean really, they have 100% lala FC's, if thats allowed, then whats wrong with all male?
definitely bait with a side of slightly insulting as per their standard style.

Wrong comparison. Being a lala is a choise, being male is not (you get that assigned at birth). While you can say that chaning gender is an option, you are still assigned a gender at birth, and that gender wont change, yet a very important factor. Its called biology.

Even if you choose to change gender, many features will never match, no matter how much effort you took. And therefor in biology you still arent the other gender. However, the problem is that some people want that enforced through politics. They will call themselve a women, even though biology says they arent. Biology is still the ruling factor here, since its a key factor for multiplying (the driving factor of life). Maybe science will at some point get to this state (after all, ther are animals that can, proving that in theory it should be possible), but currently thats at least 50 years away. Thats why the LGBT+ combination is generaly used as a collection. Since there are many combinations you can end up with, each with their own preference, but in general having a similar case (a match that in biology isnt natural for multiplying).

Yet if you want to be a lala, you use a fantasia and you are done, you are now 100% lala. There is no backlash from changing (except maybe for your wallet).

Thats why the issue is actualy diffirent here. Changing genders is on a totaly diffirent level of difficulty (currently impossible in biology, but very well possible in visual).