





Except no one can see you're mod-based outfits but you.
Limsa Lominsa Aetheryte Plaza demonstrates why that's an issue:
for many people, glams are for others to see, as well as oneself.
Add to that the risk that a popular mod may eventually be hijacked to serve as a cyberattack vector, and it seems likely that there will always be a large market for authentic glams.




Ah ha so you already know about the plugin that lets you share appearances, but also show you don't know how it works by implying that. Good to know.Except no one can see you're mod-based outfits but you.
Limsa Lominsa Aetheryte Plaza demonstrates why that's an issue:
for many people, glams are for others to see, as well as oneself.
Add to that the risk that a popular mod may eventually be hijacked to serve as a cyberattack vector, and it seems likely that there will always be a large market for authentic glams.


Would you all prefer the cash shop not exist in its entirety at all? Less options = better?
Or would you prefer regions where the game is under entirely different operating setup (China/Korea) which don’t have a subscription version and rely on cash shop items to operate to simply not share the things they’ve created to keep their operation afloat?
Bottom line, the things created in the cash shop were created expressly to sell in the cash shop. No cash shop = no extra optional items. And no side-benefits that come from the sales (like extra housing wards).
Love it, hate it, your call…but it is incredibly disingenuous to call this cash shop predatory or unfair when compared to other games of similar type.
If it’s an issue of price, it certainly might feel unfair for some, but as long as the items are selling, there is no incentive to reduce price..and why should SE when they know it fuels future endeavors.
You're presenting a false dilemma. We have no hard evidence that the cash shop items would simply never have been created had the cash shop not existed. We don't know how much of the cash shop income is directly returned to the development of the game or simply adds to the profits of the game. It's like saying that a billionaire CEO wouldn't give a Christmas bonus to his employees if he had a reduced salary.Would you all prefer the cash shop not exist in its entirety at all? Less options = better?
Or would you prefer regions where the game is under entirely different operating setup (China/Korea) which don’t have a subscription version and rely on cash shop items to operate to simply not share the things they’ve created to keep their operation afloat?
Bottom line, the things created in the cash shop were created expressly to sell in the cash shop. No cash shop = no extra optional items. And no side-benefits that come from the sales (like extra housing wards).
Love it, hate it, your call…but it is incredibly disingenuous to call this cash shop predatory or unfair when compared to other games of similar type.
If it’s an issue of price, it certainly might feel unfair for some, but as long as the items are selling, there is no incentive to reduce price..and why should SE when they know it fuels future endeavors.
Also, it's not disingenuous to have an opinion on something regardless of how it compares to other similar products. If everyone is doing something predatory, that doesn't make it not predatory.




I think it's safe to say a lot of the items wouldn't exist without the cash shop.You're presenting a false dilemma. We have no hard evidence that the cash shop items would simply never have been created had the cash shop not existed. We don't know how much of the cash shop income is directly returned to the development of the game or simply adds to the profits of the game. It's like saying that a billionaire CEO wouldn't give a Christmas bonus to his employees if he had a reduced salary.
Also, it's not disingenuous to have an opinion on something regardless of how it compares to other similar products. If everyone is doing something predatory, that doesn't make it not predatory.
I agree with this. However, I don't think FFXIV's cash shop is really predatory yet, people can argue the pricing, but that's not really predatory, in my opinion. Predatory would be if they were doing "limited time" sales, items on rotation, premium battlepass, lootboxes, pay for convenience, etc..
WHM | RDM | DNC




Of course, I'm sure there is an argument to be made that certain aspects or items are predatory, or bordering on it, but I don't think the whole store is at that level yet. Like someone could argue story or level skips, things not being account bound, etc..
WHM | RDM | DNC
agreed, the only thing I think is truly predatory is the retainers, but players have accepted it, so it is what it is.I think it's safe to say a lot of the items wouldn't exist without the cash shop.
I agree with this. However, I don't think FFXIV's cash shop is really predatory yet, people can argue the pricing, but that's not really predatory, in my opinion. Predatory would be if they were doing "limited time" sales, items on rotation, premium battlepass, lootboxes, pay for convenience, etc..




Right. Retainers. I don't really use them so they weren't on my mind, but I do recall complaints about them in the past. I think it really depends. People were more accepting of the cash shop in the past, or things like retainers, but things can change very quickly.
I don't think I'd personally label it "predatory" either, but yeah, I'm sure that speed boost is nice. I don't have that mount.![]()
Last edited by SturmChurro; 09-23-2022 at 03:28 AM.
WHM | RDM | DNC
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


