Warning: long post ahead.
This could just be in my head, but this feeling has been niggling at me since Endwalker. I recently rewatched some EW cutscenes (A Guide of Sorts #2 and Sound the Bell, School’s In) and i STILL feel it. So I figured, why not share?
So: does anyone else think Scholarch Montichaigne is suspicious and will be potentially nefarious in the future?
The first thing that raised my hackles about him was his introduction. I’ve tried to identify why and I think it comes down to two things: the timing of his interruption, and the cinematic direction of the scene.
The cinematic direction is the simplest: when he cuts in and speaks the music suddenly cuts out. On it’s own, that’s just a device to snap the tension and make the viewer take notice. So it’s not sus on it’s own. But it does make you focus on this man who has suddenly just cut into the scene. It feels akin to hearing glass break all of a sudden in an otherwise quiet room. You aren’t sure whether it’s gonna lead to something good or bad, but it’s startling regardless and spikes your adrenaline and curiosity.
The other red flag in this scene to me is *when* he breaks into the conversation and, secondarily, what he says. Or just the way he says it, really.
Forchenault and Alphinaud are talking and Alphinaud has just expressed his response to his father’s argument from Gridania of having to have faith in himself bc others trust him. We of course now know that this is something that Forchenault himself struggles with. So Dad looks away, and then looks back, and opens his mouth about to respond. And you really get the sense that we may just be getting some kind of breakthrough here between them and he’s going to say something important. Maybe something that will finally bring some clarity to his actions.
And *that’s* when the Scholarch pipes up, derailing the conversation. And he does so by calling it an endless debate, dismissing it as a tangent, essentially saying “hey let’s get back to deciding whether we expel these guys. “
And it just strikes me as so purposefully, perfectly timed on his part. He was waiting in the wings for the right moment to cut in and felt, for some reason, that that was it. It’s calculated. And seems to be designed to avoid Forchenault saying what he was going to say to Al in that moment.
The Scholarch then proceeds to charm the forum in favor of letting us stay by appealing to their curiosity. Which is a good thing for us, yes. But it does also show the man is not above being manipulative.
This is not a bad thing inherently, of course. There’s a fine line between persuasion and manipulation, that line being whether you are honest or not. And I don’t think Montichaigne was acting with integrity here.
I think, given what he later tells us in the studium, the Scholarch stopped Forchenault from talking b/c he wanted to help us himself instead. If he let Forchenault break in that moment and give hints (“hints” cus he was magically prevented from spilling the beans) to the kids during the forum session, then the Scholarch couldn’t do it. So instead, he cuts him off and then, secretly, undermines him later by feeding us information. And conveniently makes himself our important ally who shares information no one else will.
And he also doesn’t actively dissuade the kids of the notion that their father is doing something nefarious, even though he could. Forchenault has been an inexplicable douche to this point and the Scholarch knows why. Even if he can’t articulate specifics, he doesn’t try to put the minds of his good friend’s grandchildren at ease about their dad’s motives even a little? It’s odd, especially given how kindly he’s coming across.
Speaking of, another thing that bugged me was how quickly the normally more cynical Alisiae trusts the man. It’s b/c he was friends with Louisoix and Galuf, as they point out. This could be innocent enough. But b/c I’m suspicious of him due to the above, I do wonder if this wasn’t just another bit of convenience for him that, combined with his cooperation, let him earn the twins and krile’s trust instantly. And ours’ by extension. And that that is just too convenient.
There’s more:
like the fact he’s willing to undermine the forum in the first place given that, unlike us, he actually does know what they’re doing and why. He never makes any mention of a motive for helping us. And at that point it was just some vague telophoroi threat we were dealing with, not the existential end of days the forum was preparing for. Arguably, helping us meddle would actually hurt that prep. His friendship with the galuf and Louisoix is mentioned so you can infer he wants to help the outside world, but he never actually explains. Just says he feels “curiosity should be nurtured, not stifled”. which just tells us that he supports us looking into the forum, not WHY he does.
Or how he claims the forum’s enchantment is akin to memory manipulation, but the guy who tried to talk in the forum scene seemed to literally choke on his words, not forget them. So was he lying? But this could just be a more meta thing at play to just use the scholarch to give us aether lore, so I dunno.
(Also what kind of secrecy charm lets you TELL people you are under a secrecy charm? But this isn’t Wolf Among Us so ok fine.)
Having written it out, I know it could just be what it seems: an introduction of an ally to us while the forum and Forchenault are being stubborn. And a way to introduce memory related lore for Elpis and the finale later.
I guess what I’m saying is Montichainge’s readiness to go behind the forum’s back and his specific interference with Forchenault raised my eyebrows. lol also the fact that the scholarch gives us memory lore and we are now dealing with memories seemingly powering memoria somehow on the 13th. And the studium prophecy about the lifestream, which deals a lot with memory aether. And who’s in charge of the studium? Yup.
In short, Montichainge seems sus. Discuss.