Expand Armoire

[Hysterior]

You spelled "Delete Armoire" wrong.

[ICountFrom0]

You spelled "Delete Armoire" wrong.

Far better to expand the part of the system that takes up less resources. If the armour is just a checklist that can only hold the fact that you have owned a given item and shown it to the armour to turn it in, then it needs to hold very little data. One bit per item.

Then we use the crosslink between it and the dresser to put it on the glam plates, at this point it's linked into a glam plate and can have dye applied to it. Now it's storing the item existance and it's dye code. It's also only using existing tech, the glam plate.

At this point we've got a larger list of possible items (all items in armour, expanded to include all scavanger and recompentence items, and purchased mogstation items.) then the limited 800 items in the dresser itself, and quite a bit of functionality by having both systems.

Any item in the dresser has to remember a lot of things, up to and including the name of the crafter if it was crafted. Armiour strips all that, and I'm FINE with that. The space used to store a single name (probably uses the lookup number like on the lodestone) could instead store ... well... a LOT of armour items. THOUSANDS is an understatement.

[george357]

will wait and see if they act on this

[Ransu]

I never understood the armoire limitations. Its pretty annoying.

[ICountFrom0]

We know they won't do anything, it would cut into the market of selling you more inventory space.

This is nothing but dreaming with others who like the same shared dream.

[znushu]

the armoire is limited because it would make the cap on the glamor dresser null and void.

[SannaR]

I'd still find things to put into the dresser even if there was more things you could put into the armoire. At least things that would make sense to be in there.