Quote Originally Posted by aveyond-dreams View Post
With all due respect if you want to play in a game world full of republics and the sort, why not play games like Call of Duty which are more based off the real world? People play fantasy games because they want to experience something different. Why should an american teenager pick up and play FFXIV if it's just going to be a bunch of republics in game just like the one they live in real life? It doesn't make sense.
Quote Originally Posted by aveyond-dreams View Post
I however do not. I want my fantasy world to remain as such. I do not believe that people who want the real world in FFXIV should be prioritized in this manner, there are fundamental pieces of world building that shouldn't be compromised in the way in which they are now. Garlemald should have remained a monarchy. There should be far more monarchies as well. Ilsabard as a whole was left underdeveloped by the decision to rush the conclusion of Season 1, and my confidence in the current state of affairs is at an all time low.
Irrelevant question and argument. People play fantasy games for a large number of reasons, and the existence of some republics in a fantasy setting doesn't take away from the numerous monarchies and other oligarchal governments which also exist in the game. This is not a zero-sum where it's Oops, All Monarchies or nothing else.

Quote Originally Posted by aveyond-dreams View Post
As I said above, they have no right and are nobody to try and cause regime change in Garlemald or have any say in their future. Sharlayan is under no threat from being invaded by Garlemald. Leaving the Garlean Empire with nothing but a faceless senate in order to continue to push the ideals of Sharlayan democracy was a mistake. It has robbed the region of the things that drew me towards it in the first place, but I suppose if what you want is to see your own real life ideals reflected directly in the game world then you'd have no issue with the current state of the writing.
I mean, technically speaking...Garlemald lost. If we're adhering to a medieval-esque standard of nations and war (as you claim to want), then the moment that Garlemald was no longer able to defend itself and surrendered to the Eorzean Alliance, the latter technically had the "right" to do whatever they want. They could have carved up the area like Europe did Africa or East Asia. The fact that the EA leaders are giving the people ANY autonomy on how they want to rebuild at all is pretty progressive from a modern standpoint.

And like I said before, if that ruins the game for you, then oh well. You won't be the first or the last to be displeased.