If I'm not spamming all my abilities on cooldown it's bad game design.
- an average FF14 player
If I'm not spamming all my abilities on cooldown it's bad game design.
- an average FF14 player
Agreed. Making SSD a gapcloser removes 2 button presses every 2 minutes, which amounts to 8 clicks in a 6:30 minute fight. DRG is busy during even-minute bursts because of the machine-gun oGCD double weaves required, but it's honestly not overwhelming. Litany should last 20s for the DRG to make this less strict, among other things already stated in the thread. However, removing those 2 buttons for such bursts will make them feel like the odd-minute bursts, which are not particularly busy.While I don't hate the idea, if the job is already wholly loved as is, why would removing some of its decision making and reducing its APM by a cast per minute be a good thing?
It's not as if SSD is hard to weave as is, and it still has 15 seconds' span of leniency for mobility purposes, such that between it, DFD, SD, and EJ, DRG is already quite the mobile job.
The difference between ShB and EW is that we press two more buttons in even-minute bursts: an extra SSD and WWT. Life Surge is included in some of these windows, but not all. In a full uptime scenario, LS coincides in the opener, in the 2-min window (this one is tight but happens pretty much automatically and after all the other buttons are already used), and in the 6-min window (although with BL up, which reduces its value). I cannot recall right now if it's up for the following ones, since there's not a full uptime fight lasting that long in the tier.
So surely two extra clicks doesn't mean that the job is too busy.
One thing though, DRG is ironically not a mobile job. Yes, we do have 5 jumps, of which 4 take us to the enemy, but the number of situations in which the jumps will coincide with a mechanic in such a way are rare, and saving jumps for such situations is a huge DPS loss.
In this tier, it happens in certain Pinax patterns in P4-1S and to return to the boss after the 2nd kick bait in Act 3 of P4-2S. In the latter scenario, EJ can be used just as well (although it admittedly requires precise timing).
I personally think the job still has room for at least one more expansion, even though perhaps some new actions would have to be in the same button a la Phantom Kamaitachi or Plentiful Harvest. Still, if we look at most other jobs, they're all in the same boat. Which ones actually have space to put new stuff? SMN, DNC and...? Let's think about adding new stuff to NIN, SAM, DRK, GNB... where does it go?
Even so, they can be creative and rework the job around its existing kit. It's lacking more interaction between its oGCD and GCDs, so why not go there to make things a bit more cohesive?
Not only retaining the name would be weird, but also the animation. It's a dive that points the spear towards the enemy, and it'd look really weird turned into a 0 damage gapcloser.I have question. I keep seeing everyone suggest removing the potency from spineshatter dive, but... what's spine shattering about that? It sounds like everyone just wants one less jump ability in favor of having a gap closer along with a disengage. Reaper has that, and samurai has that, monk doesn't, and technically dragoon doesn't... is that a request for homogenization or is that viewed as nuanced design?
What they could do though is to reduce the cooldown to 30s and adjust the potency (although this'll require extra potency in other abilities to compensate for the loss of damage before the 2nd charge is learned). Now the ability fulfills mainly the role of a gapcloser, but also the role of an ability to pool for all buff windows, which would make odd windows a bit busier, but they're quite lenient as they are.
Still, my wish for SSD is a rework of its role as a damaging ability in 7.0. It's our "second" jump, it should have something more interesting to it. Same goes for our first capstone ability, DFD.
DRG's centered around jumps and they have to deal damage. As Shurrikhan replies to you after, there's a nuance to having gapclosers retain their damage. Since their DPS contribution is low, using them to keep uptime is always more beneficial than putting an extra charge under buffs. There's a certain optimization angle here.
Yes, we could remove the damage of the oGCD gapclosers that all tanks share, for example, and it could be fine but only if something else with nuance was added instead, because otherwise the potency is removed for nothing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.