


I’d probably call them both 5/10s, but with points derived from different places. If dftc just paused gl deterioration they could easily have addressed at least one complaint.Let's not fool ourselves, 6.0 MNK stuck the landing better than SMN did. As much as I have my problems with the current iteration (I could talk for days about it but this is a SAM thread not a MNK thread) I will not deny the good points that came around because of the new design, such as Nadi optimization, Thunderclap or Bootshine having less of a strangle hold on the rotation.
If ShB MNK was a 3/10, then EW MNK is a 5/10 to me. Decent, but still has some major problems such as boring downtime, useless buttons (Riddle of Wind, Riddle of Earth, Anatman, etc), Blitz has no presence outside of RoF, the job still lacks a clear identity for itself and Chakra still remains as the biggest issue to the job. What we gained does not entirely make up for what was lost.
That's all I'll say on the matter unless I suddenly recall something else I may have missed.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

