Quote Originally Posted by Damnhedge View Post
...
100% spot on analysis. People can question if the Sundering was the best course of action or the moral weight of it, but thinking that Hydaelyn was some uncaring witch of a harpy, reveling in the suffering of others is just insane and matches literally nothing we've ever been told in the MSQ, including the parts where we meet and interact with Venat herself.

Quote Originally Posted by anhaato View Post
Anyways, your arguments are so stereotypical of Venat simps
Objection: Ad hominem fallacy. And a very poor one at that.

Someone explaining why you're wrong isn't a "simp".

who close their ears to basic story facts that contradict the narrative of her being some benevolent goddess that I almost feel like you're "one of us" on a troll account. Like, your argument and understanding of the story is so hilariously bad. Even the devs have openly contradicted your claims in a past q&a.
Dude, where?

All that he said was from the MSQ. It's as canon as it gets. We have ZERO - none, zilch, nada - reason to think the anti-Hydaelyn narrative is true. The CLOSEST you could say is that she was a good person trying to do the right thing and mucked it up because she had no really good options and you think she could have tried a little harder. That's it..

Your arguments and understanding of the story is hilariously bad.

From meeting Venat, the impression we were given was that she was a good soul who wanted to do the right thing. This also goes along with everything else we've ever been told about her.

She's neither villain nor antagonist. She was a good person trapped in a no-win scenario where every option was bad.